• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从童年期罗夏测验评分预测青少年及成人犯罪行为

Prediction of adolescent and adult delinquency from childhood Rorschach ratings.

作者信息

Janson Harald, Stattin Håkan

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2003 Aug;81(1):51-63. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8101_05.

DOI:10.1207/S15327752JPA8101_05
PMID:12842802
Abstract

Relatively few studies have predicted adolescent or adult delinquency from childhood Rorschach data. Incremental validity of Rorschach measures over other known consistent and more easily obtained predictors has typically not been investigated. We addressed Rorschach data's incremental validity over mother's reports of externalizing behavior and mother-child relations for predicting officially registered adolescent and adult delinquency in a longitudinal study of 122 Swedish men. The Rorschach measures we used were aggregates of blind, prospectively performed, global expert ratings based on a holistic evaluation of protocols. An aggregate of Rorschach-based ratings of ego strength significantly improved the prediction of delinquency in adolescence and adulthood over and above earlier identified best predictors (mother's ratings of mother-child relations and externalizing problem behavior).

摘要

相对较少的研究从童年时期的罗夏测验数据来预测青少年或成人犯罪。罗夏测验指标相对于其他已知的、一致且更易获得的预测指标的增量效度通常未被研究。在一项对122名瑞典男性的纵向研究中,我们探讨了罗夏测验数据相对于母亲报告的外化行为和母子关系在预测官方登记的青少年和成人犯罪方面的增量效度。我们使用的罗夏测验指标是基于对测验记录进行整体评估的、由盲态的、前瞻性实施的、全局专家评分汇总而成。基于罗夏测验的自我力量评分汇总显著提高了对青少年期和成年期犯罪的预测,超过了先前确定的最佳预测指标(母亲对母子关系和外化问题行为的评分)。

相似文献

1
Prediction of adolescent and adult delinquency from childhood Rorschach ratings.从童年期罗夏测验评分预测青少年及成人犯罪行为
J Pers Assess. 2003 Aug;81(1):51-63. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8101_05.
2
The Rorschach Ego Impairment Index: prediction of treatment outcome in a child psychiatric population.罗夏克自我损害指数:儿童精神科群体治疗结果的预测
J Pers Assess. 2003 Aug;81(1):11-9. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8101_02.
3
MMPI-A and Rorschach indices related to depression and conduct disorder: an evaluation of the incremental validity hypothesis.与抑郁和品行障碍相关的明尼苏达多相人格测验青少年版(MMPI-A)和罗夏墨迹测验指标:对增量效度假设的评估
J Pers Assess. 1997 Dec;69(3):517-33. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6903_7.
4
Child to adult continuities of psychopathology: a 24-year follow-up.儿童到成人精神病理学的连续性:24 年随访研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Sep;120(3):230-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01422.x. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
5
Interpersonal callousness, hyperactivity/impulsivity, inattention, and conduct problems as precursors to delinquency persistence in boys: a comparison of three grade-based cohorts.人际冷漠、多动/冲动、注意力不集中和行为问题作为男孩犯罪持续存在的先兆:三个年级队列的比较
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006 Feb;35(1):46-59. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3501_5.
6
Rorschach comparisons of male juvenile sex offenders and nonsex offenders.
J Pers Assess. 1989 Fall;53(3):546-53. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5303_11.
7
Male and female delinquency trajectories from pre through middle adolescence and their continuation in late adolescence.从青春期前期到中期阶段男性和女性的犯罪轨迹及其在青春期后期的延续情况。
Adolescence. 2005 Winter;40(160):729-48.
8
Reliability and validity of rorschach aggression variables with a sample of adjudicated adolescents.罗夏墨迹测验攻击变量在被判定有罪青少年样本中的信度与效度。
J Pers Assess. 2005 Aug;85(1):33-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_03.
9
Predicting young adult social functioning from developmental trajectories of externalizing behaviour.从外化行为的发展轨迹预测青少年的社会功能
Psychol Med. 2008 Jul;38(7):989-99. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707002309. Epub 2007 Nov 30.
10
Predicting DMS-IV cluster B personality disorder criteria from MMPI-2 and Rorschach data: a test of incremental validity.从明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI - 2)和罗夏墨迹测验数据预测《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DMS - IV)B类人格障碍标准:增量效度检验
J Pers Assess. 2001 Feb;76(1):150-68. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_9.