Alnot J-Y, Katz V, Hardy P
Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, Hôpital Bichat, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003 Jun;89(4):304-9.
We reviewed retrospectively outcome in 22 patients with recent or old fractures of the radial head treated with a GUEPAR radial head prosthesis. This prosthesis, derived from the GUEPAR sliding total elbow prosthesis, has a cemented mobile metal cup.
Eighteen patients underwent emergency surgery, four deferred surgery. Mean age at surgery was 41 years and mean follow-up was 18 months. The Mayo Clinic score was calculated to assess clinical outcome. Static and dynamic x-rays of the elbows and wrists were analyzed. All of the fractures were total or displaced head fractures and 72% involved elbow dislocation. The coronoid process was fixed in one patient, the olecranon in one and the medial ligaments were repaired in 5. The quality of the cartilage of the humeral condyle was checked before insertion of the prosthesis. Proper position and height of the prosthesis were carefully controlled.
There were no complications. Outcome was good in the patients who underwent emergency surgery with a mean Mayo Clinic score of 83/100, mean force 75%, good joint motion (77 degrees pronation, 79 degrees supination), stable elbow, and no wrist problems. Outcome was not as good in patients who underwent deferred implantation, particularly for joint motion (pronation 44 degrees, supination 54 degrees ). The distal radio-ulnar ratio was not perfectly restored. Finally 4 patients required arthrolysis for limited flexion/extension, proportionally more among the deferred patients.
Resection of the radial head is an alternative in case of complex fractures. There are two drawbacks. The first is an unstable elbow in valgus if the medial ligaments are damaged. The second is an ascension of the radius if the interosseous membrane is damaged. Osteosynthesis is another alternative which is difficult to achieve and does not give good results (in our experience in comparison with 20 equivalent fractures, and in the literature). The GUEPAR radial head prosthesis appears to be a good solution. It stabilizes the elbow, prevents ascension of the radius, allows early rehabilitation, and provides good subjective results, particularly after emergency surgery.
我们回顾性分析了22例采用GUEPAR桡骨头假体治疗的近期或陈旧性桡骨头骨折患者的治疗结果。该假体源自GUEPAR滑动式全肘关节假体,有一个骨水泥固定的活动金属杯。
18例患者接受了急诊手术,4例延期手术。手术时的平均年龄为41岁,平均随访时间为18个月。计算Mayo诊所评分以评估临床结果。对肘部和腕部的静态及动态X线片进行分析。所有骨折均为完全或移位的头部骨折,72%伴有肘关节脱位。1例患者的冠状突进行了固定,1例患者的鹰嘴进行了固定,5例患者修复了内侧韧带。在假体植入前检查肱骨髁软骨的质量。仔细控制假体的正确位置和高度。
无并发症发生。接受急诊手术的患者治疗结果良好,Mayo诊所平均评分为83/100,平均肌力为75%,关节活动良好(旋前77度,旋后79度),肘关节稳定,无腕部问题。延期植入患者的治疗结果较差,尤其是关节活动方面(旋前44度,旋后54度)。桡尺远侧比例未完全恢复。最后,4例患者因屈伸受限需要进行关节松解术,延期手术患者中的比例更高。
对于复杂骨折,桡骨头切除术是一种选择。存在两个缺点。一是如果内侧韧带受损,肘关节会出现外翻不稳定。二是如果骨间膜受损,桡骨会上升。骨固定术是另一种选择,但难以实施且效果不佳(根据我们与20例类似骨折的经验以及文献报道)。GUEPAR桡骨头假体似乎是一个很好的解决方案。它能稳定肘关节,防止桡骨上升,允许早期康复,并提供良好的主观结果,尤其是在急诊手术后。