• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗器械价格变化对医疗费用的影响。

Impact of change in the price of percutaneous coronary intervention devices on medical expenses.

作者信息

Kuroda Nakabumi, Kobayashi Yoshio, Desai Kartik, Costantini Costantino, Kobayashi Mika, Komuro Issei

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Sawara Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Circ J. 2003 Jul;67(7):576-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.67.576.

DOI:10.1253/circj.67.576
PMID:12845178
Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) devices are much more expensive in Japan than in the United States, but their prices were reduced in April 2002. This study evaluated the impact of that change in the price of PCI devices on medical expenses. In-hospital costs of 22 consecutive patients who underwent elective single-vessel PCI without a debulking procedure before April 2002 were collected and the in-hospital cost of each patient was recalculated by applying the current prices of the PCI devices and those in the USA. For patients treated with PCI before April 2002, the in-hospital cost was 1,456,375+/-358,781 yen, but when the current price is used, the in-hospital cost is estimated to be 1,355,812 +/-313,237 yen (7% reduction). If the prices of the devices were reduced to those in USA, there would be a 53% reduction (689,417 +/-99,139 yen). Although the change in the price of PCI devices in April 2002 has reduced in-hospital costs, the devices are still much more expensive in Japan than in the USA. Further reduction of the price is required to make PCI more cost-effective.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)设备在日本比在美国贵得多,但在2002年4月其价格有所降低。本研究评估了PCI设备价格的这一变化对医疗费用的影响。收集了2002年4月之前连续22例接受择期单支血管PCI且未进行减容手术患者的住院费用,并通过应用PCI设备的当前价格及美国价格重新计算了每位患者的住院费用。对于2002年4月之前接受PCI治疗的患者,住院费用为1,456,375±358,781日元,但使用当前价格时,住院费用估计为1,355,812±313,237日元(降低了7%)。如果设备价格降至美国的水平,将降低53%(689,417±99,139日元)。尽管2002年4月PCI设备价格的变化降低了住院费用,但该设备在日本仍比在美国贵得多。需要进一步降低价格以使PCI更具成本效益。

相似文献

1
Impact of change in the price of percutaneous coronary intervention devices on medical expenses.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗器械价格变化对医疗费用的影响。
Circ J. 2003 Jul;67(7):576-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.67.576.
2
Price disparity of percutaneous coronary intervention devices in Japan and the United States in 2006.2006年日本和美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗器械的价格差异
Circ J. 2007 Jul;71(7):1128-30. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1128.
3
Current disparities in the prices of medical materials between Japan and the United States: further investigation of cardiovascular medical devices.日本与美国之间医疗材料价格的当前差异:心血管医疗设备的进一步调查
J Cardiol. 2007 Feb;49(2):77-81.
4
Comparing cost aspects of coronary artery bypass graft surgery with coronary artery stenting.比较冠状动脉搭桥手术与冠状动脉支架置入术的成本方面。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2012 Oct;53(5):641-50. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
5
Effects of changing clinical practice on costs and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention between 1998 and 2002.1998年至2002年间临床实践变化对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成本和结果的影响。
Heart. 2007 Feb;93(2):195-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.090134. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
6
[Cost analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in Japan and USA].
Nihon Rinsho. 2003 Apr;61 Suppl 4:632-7.
7
Economic impact of same-day home discharge after uncomplicated transradial percutaneous coronary intervention and bolus-only abciximab regimen.非复杂经桡动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和单纯推注阿昔单抗后当天出院的经济影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct;3(10):1011-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.011.
8
How firms set prices for medical materials: a multi-country study.企业如何为医疗材料定价:一项多国研究。
Health Policy. 2009 Sep;92(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
9
Price differences between Japan and the US for medical materials and how to reduce them.日本和美国在医疗材料方面的价格差异以及如何缩小这些差异。
Health Policy. 2007 Jun;82(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
10
Cost of single-vessel and multivessel coronary drug-eluting stenting: comparison to the DRG funding level.单支血管和多支血管冠状动脉药物洗脱支架置入术的成本:与诊断相关分组(DRG)资金水平的比较。
Ital Heart J. 2005 Jan;6(1):52-8.