• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2006年日本和美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗器械的价格差异

Price disparity of percutaneous coronary intervention devices in Japan and the United States in 2006.

作者信息

Yasunaga Hideo, Ide Hiroo, Imamura Tomoaki, Ohe Kazuhiko

机构信息

Department of Planning, Information and Management, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Circ J. 2007 Jul;71(7):1128-30. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1128.

DOI:10.1253/circj.71.1128
PMID:17587722
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The price disparity between Japan and foreign countries for medical devices is a controversial issue. Price differences existed between Japan and USA for various medical devices in early 2005, so in the present study, a more precise and detailed investigation of the latest market prices of medical devices between Japan and USA was conducted in 2006, focusing on coronary stents and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) catheters, for an evaluation of the efficacy of current Japanese policies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Japanese market prices were obtained from 31 university hospitals, and US market prices were obtained from 1 hospital chain and 2 group-purchasing organizations. The price ratio (Japanese market price/US market price) was determined to be 1.2-1.4 for drug-eluting stents (DES), 1.6-2.4 for non-DES, and 4.1-5.1 for PTCA catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed that the price disparity was relatively small for DES, but still significant for non-DES and PTCA catheters. Radical measures must be taken to improve the fundamental causes of price disparity and might include reviewing the implementation of the Japanese Pharmaceutical Affairs Law, abolishing the reimbursement price system for medical devices, and establishing centers of clinical excellence.

摘要

背景

日本与外国医疗器械价格差异是一个有争议的问题。2005年初,日本和美国各种医疗器械存在价格差异,因此在本研究中,2006年对日本和美国医疗器械的最新市场价格进行了更精确、详细的调查,重点是冠状动脉支架和经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)导管,以评估日本现行政策的效果。

方法与结果

从31家大学医院获取日本市场价格,从1家连锁医院和2家团购组织获取美国市场价格。药物洗脱支架(DES)的价格比(日本市场价格/美国市场价格)确定为1.2 - 1.4,非DES为1.6 - 2.4,PTCA导管为4.1 - 5.1。

结论

结果表明,DES的价格差异相对较小,但非DES和PTCA导管的价格差异仍然很大。必须采取激进措施来改善价格差异的根本原因,可能包括审查日本《药事法》的实施情况、废除医疗器械报销价格制度以及建立卓越临床中心。

相似文献

1
Price disparity of percutaneous coronary intervention devices in Japan and the United States in 2006.2006年日本和美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗器械的价格差异
Circ J. 2007 Jul;71(7):1128-30. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1128.
2
Current disparities in the prices of medical materials between Japan and the United States: further investigation of cardiovascular medical devices.日本与美国之间医疗材料价格的当前差异:心血管医疗设备的进一步调查
J Cardiol. 2007 Feb;49(2):77-81.
3
Impact of change in the price of percutaneous coronary intervention devices on medical expenses.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗器械价格变化对医疗费用的影响。
Circ J. 2003 Jul;67(7):576-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.67.576.
4
Price differences between Japan and the US for medical materials and how to reduce them.日本和美国在医疗材料方面的价格差异以及如何缩小这些差异。
Health Policy. 2007 Jun;82(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
5
How firms set prices for medical materials: a multi-country study.企业如何为医疗材料定价:一项多国研究。
Health Policy. 2009 Sep;92(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
6
[Cost analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in Japan and USA].
Nihon Rinsho. 2003 Apr;61 Suppl 4:632-7.
7
Long-Term Outcomes After Treatment With a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Balloon Angioplasty: Insights From the PEPCAD-DES Study (Treatment of Drug-eluting Stent [DES] In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent Please Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty [PTCA] Catheter).紫杉醇涂层球囊与球囊血管成形术治疗的长期结果:PEPCAD-DES 研究的见解(使用 SeQuent Please 紫杉醇涂层经皮腔内冠状动脉血管成形术 [PTCA] 导管治疗药物洗脱支架 [DES] 支架内再狭窄)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.023.
8
Long-term resource use and cost of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus stenting in the elderly: a retrospective claims data analysis.
Value Health. 2003 Sep-Oct;6(5):534-41; discussion 532-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65258.x.
9
[Cost analysis of procedural fee for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty at six Japanese hospitals].
J Cardiol. 2001 Feb;37(2):83-90.
10
Initial experience with reuse of coronary angioplasty catheters in the United States.美国冠状动脉血管成形术导管再利用的初步经验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Dec;30(7):1735-40. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00362-8.