Katz Andrew L, Gentile Michael A, Craig Damian M, Quick George, Cheifetz Ira M
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul;31(7):2006-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000070584.00490.7B.
To compare gas exchange with heliox and oxygen-enriched air during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, while controlling for tidal volume, in a pediatric swine model of acute lung injury. We hypothesized that when tidal volume delivery is held constant, heliox does not alter gas exchange.
Randomized, crossover trial.
University animal research laboratory.
Ten swine (4.4-5.4 kg).
Acute lung injury (A-a gradient of >300 mm Hg) was created using repeated saline lavage during conventional mechanical ventilation. The animals were then administered high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and ventilated with 60% oxygen/40% helium and 60% oxygen/40% nitrogen in a randomized, crossover trial. When changing gas mixtures within each animal, mean airway pressure (Paw = 16.8 +/- 0.3 cm H(2)O) and frequency (10 Hz) were held constant. Oscillation amplitude (DeltaP) was adjusted to maintain constant tidal volume delivery as measured by respiratory inductive plethysmography. Next, the animals were ventilated with 40% oxygen/60% helium and 40% oxygen/60% nitrogen in a randomized crossover trial, again controlling for tidal volume.
Gas exchange was assessed by arterial blood gas analysis after ventilation with each gas mixture. We demonstrated no significant difference in Paco(2) or Pao(2) between the heliox and oxygen-enriched air with either the 40% or 60% oxygen mixtures. The oscillation amplitude required to achieve the same tidal volume delivery was significantly less with heliox.
We conclude that if tidal volume delivery is maintained constant, heliox does not alter gas exchange when compared with oxygen-enriched air. However, to achieve the same tidal volume delivery, a lower oscillation amplitude is required with heliox. The clinical benefit of heliox administration during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation has yet to be determined. Possible advantages of heliox include improved ventilation of larger patients when approaching the power limitations of the Sensormedics 3100A oscillator and a potential reduction in the oscillation amplitude delivered to the more proximal gas exchange units.
在急性肺损伤的仔猪模型中,于高频振荡通气期间,在控制潮气量的同时,比较氦氧混合气与富氧空气的气体交换情况。我们假设,当潮气量输送保持恒定时,氦氧混合气不会改变气体交换。
随机交叉试验。
大学动物研究实验室。
10头猪(4.4 - 5.4千克)。
在传统机械通气期间,通过反复盐水灌洗造成急性肺损伤(肺泡 - 动脉血氧分压差>300毫米汞柱)。然后在随机交叉试验中,对动物进行高频振荡通气,并分别用60%氧气/40%氦气和60%氧气/40%氮气进行通气。在每只动物更换气体混合物时,平均气道压(Paw = 16.8 ± 0.3厘米水柱)和频率(10赫兹)保持恒定。振荡幅度(ΔP)通过呼吸感应体积描记法进行调整,以维持潮气量输送恒定。接下来,在另一次随机交叉试验中,动物分别用40%氧气/60%氦气和40%氧气/60%氮气进行通气,同样控制潮气量。
在每种气体混合物通气后,通过动脉血气分析评估气体交换情况。我们发现,无论是40%还是60%氧气混合气,氦氧混合气与富氧空气之间的动脉血二氧化碳分压(Paco₂)或动脉血氧分压(Pao₂)均无显著差异。使用氦氧混合气时,实现相同潮气量输送所需的振荡幅度显著更小。
我们得出结论,如果潮气量输送保持恒定,与富氧空气相比,氦氧混合气不会改变气体交换。然而,为实现相同的潮气量输送,氦氧混合气所需的振荡幅度更低。高频振荡通气期间给予氦氧混合气的临床益处尚未确定。氦氧混合气的可能优势包括,在接近Sensormedics 3100A振荡器功率极限时,改善较大患者的通气情况,以及可能降低输送到更近端气体交换单元的振荡幅度。