• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重伤患者直升机自动待命政策。

Automatic helicopter standby policy for seriously injured patients.

作者信息

Emerson Catherine, Funk Deborah L

机构信息

Albany MedFLIGHT/Life Net of New York, USA.

出版信息

Air Med J. 2003 Jul-Aug;22(4):32-5. doi: 10.1067/mmj.2003.53.

DOI:10.1067/mmj.2003.53
PMID:12847466
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Automatic standby (AS) of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) may allow improved utilization appropriateness (UA) for scene trauma, although this has not been studied.

METHODS

HEMS records were reviewed for 16 months, including date, county of origin, and UA. Data were analyzed descriptively with chi(2) where appropriate.

RESULTS

Of 274 flights, there was no significant change in UA where AS was in place versus where it was not (P =.36). One county had an increase in total flights with AS in use without a significant change in UA (P =.10).

CONCLUSION

In this region, use of an AS policy for scene trauma resulted in increased utilization of HEMS without a corresponding change in UA. Specifically, inappropriate utilization did not increase. This finding suggests that such a policy does not incur overutilization despite increasing total flights. Further study with larger numbers is necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

摘要

背景

直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)的自动待命(AS)可能会提高现场创伤的利用适宜性(UA),尽管尚未对此进行研究。

方法

回顾了16个月的HEMS记录,包括日期、出发县和UA。在适当情况下,用卡方检验对数据进行描述性分析。

结果

在274次飞行中,AS启用时与未启用时的UA没有显著变化(P = 0.36)。一个县在使用AS时总飞行次数增加,但UA没有显著变化(P = 0.10)。

结论

在该地区,对现场创伤采用AS政策导致HEMS的利用率提高,而UA没有相应变化。具体而言,不适当的利用并未增加。这一发现表明,尽管总飞行次数增加,但该政策不会导致过度利用。需要进行更多数量的进一步研究才能得出明确结论。

相似文献

1
Automatic helicopter standby policy for seriously injured patients.重伤患者直升机自动待命政策。
Air Med J. 2003 Jul-Aug;22(4):32-5. doi: 10.1067/mmj.2003.53.
2
Validation of a prehospital trauma triage tool: a 10-year perspective.一种院前创伤分诊工具的验证:十年视角
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1253-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818bbfc2.
3
Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS): impact on on-scene times.直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS):对现场救援时间的影响
J Trauma. 2007 Aug;63(2):258-62. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000240449.23201.57.
4
Inappropriate helicopter emergency medical services transports: results of a national cohort utilization review.不适当的直升机紧急医疗服务转运:一项全国队列利用审查的结果。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):434-42. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.689928. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
5
Helicopter emergency medical system in a region lacking trauma coordination (experience from Tehran).缺乏创伤协调地区的直升机紧急医疗系统(德黑兰的经验)
Emerg Med J. 2009 May;26(5):361-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.060012.
6
Effects of ground EMS and ED personnel on air medical trauma on-site times.地面急救医疗服务(EMS)人员和急诊部(ED)人员对空中医疗创伤现场救援时间的影响。
Air Med J. 2001 May-Jun;20(3):32-6.
7
EMS and emergency department physician triage: injury severity in trauma patients transported by helicopter.紧急医疗服务(EMS)与急诊科医生的分诊:直升机转运创伤患者的损伤严重程度
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Apr-Jun;9(2):198-202. doi: 10.1080/10903120590924681.
8
A retrospective analysis of the intubations performed during 5 years of helicopter emergency medical service in Amsterdam.对阿姆斯特丹直升机紧急医疗服务5年间进行的插管操作的回顾性分析。
Air Med J. 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):36-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2004.06.004.
9
Helicopter emergency medical services utilization for winter resort injuries.直升机紧急医疗服务在冬季旅游胜地损伤中的应用。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):261-70. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.541983. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
10
Helicopter scene transport of trauma patients with nonlife-threatening injuries: a meta-analysis.对非危及生命创伤患者的直升机场景转运:一项荟萃分析。
J Trauma. 2006 Jun;60(6):1257-65; discussion 1265-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196489.19928.c0.