Bledsoe Bryan E, Wesley A Keith, Eckstein Marc, Dunn Thomas M, O'Keefe Michael F
The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC, and Saint Johns Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Trauma. 2006 Jun;60(6):1257-65; discussion 1265-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196489.19928.c0.
Helicopters have become a major part of the modern trauma care system and are frequently used to transport patients from the scene of their injury to a trauma center. While early studies reported decreased mortality for trauma patients transported by helicopters when compared with those transported by ground ambulances, more recent research has questioned the benefit of helicopter transport of trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of patients transported by helicopter who have nonlife-threatening injuries.
A meta-analysis was performed on peer-review research on helicopter utilization. The inclusion criteria were all studies that evaluated trauma patients transported by helicopter from the scene of their injury to a trauma center with baseline parameters defined by Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma Score (TS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and the likelihood of survival as determined via Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) methodology.
There were 22 studies comprising 37,350 patients that met the inclusion criteria. According to the ISS, 60.0% [99% confidence interval (CI): 54.5-64.8] of patients had minor injuries, According to the TS, 61.4% (99% CI: 60.8-62.0) of patients had minor injuries. According to TRISS methodology, 69.3% (99% CI: 58.5-80.2) of patients had a greater than 90% chance of survival and thus nonlife-threatening injuries. There were 25.8% (99% CI: -1.0-52.6) of patients discharged within 24 hours after arrival at the trauma center.
The majority of trauma patients transported from the scene by helicopter have nonlife-threatening injuries. Efforts to more accurately identify those patients who would benefit most from helicopter transport from the accident scene to the trauma center are needed to reduce helicopter overutilization.
直升机已成为现代创伤护理系统的重要组成部分,常用于将患者从受伤现场转运至创伤中心。早期研究报告称,与地面救护车转运的创伤患者相比,直升机转运的创伤患者死亡率有所降低,但最近的研究对直升机转运创伤患者的益处提出了质疑。本研究的目的是确定由直升机转运的非危及生命损伤患者的比例。
对关于直升机使用情况的同行评审研究进行荟萃分析。纳入标准为所有评估从受伤现场通过直升机转运至创伤中心的创伤患者的研究,其基线参数由损伤严重度评分(ISS)、创伤评分(TS)、修订创伤评分(RTS)以及通过创伤评分-损伤严重度评分(TRISS)方法确定的生存可能性来定义。
有22项研究,共37350例患者符合纳入标准。根据ISS,60.0%[99%置信区间(CI):54.5 - 64.8]的患者为轻伤;根据TS,61.4%(99%CI:60.8 - 62.0)的患者为轻伤。根据TRISS方法,69.3%(99%CI:58.5 - 80.2)的患者生存几率大于90%,因此为非危及生命损伤。25.8%(99%CI: - 1.0 - 52.6)的患者在抵达创伤中心后24小时内出院。
大多数从现场通过直升机转运的创伤患者为非危及生命损伤。需要努力更准确地识别那些从事故现场通过直升机转运至创伤中心能最大程度获益的患者,以减少直升机的过度使用。