Steiner A
Wiederkäuerklinik, Departement für klinische Veterinärmedizin, Bremgartenstrasse 109a, 3012 Bern.
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2003 Jun;145(6):273-82. doi: 10.1024/0036-7281.145.6.273.
According to the Swiss Federal law on animal protection and welfare, painful manipulations in animals have to be performed by a veterinarian under local or general anaesthesia, except for some specifically listed surgical interventions (article 65 of the by-law on animal protection). On September 1, 2001, castration of calves and lambs has been deleted from this list of exceptions. Since then, several pressure groups have requested these interventions to be delegated to the producers for economical reasons. The current article describes the results of a web-based survey on this subject, conducted among the members of the Swiss Association of ruminant practitioners (SARP). Two separate questionnaires--one focused on calves and one on lambs--were made available to the members of the SARP for a duration of 3 months as pdf-files on the homepage of the SARP (www.svwasmr.ch). On December 31, 2002, the deadline for submission of the completed questionnaires, the membership of the SARP was constituted of 360 practicing veterinarians. The response rate was 25%. Close to a hundred percents of the responding veterinarians expressed the expectation that the SARP publish guidelines on the castration of calves and lambs. An overwhelming majority refused the delegation of castrations to the producers, and further stated that they were not ready to accept any responsibility for interventions performed by the producers. However, a third of the responding veterinarians judged the expected workload for the castration of lambs to presumably exceed their current capacity. It is concluded from the results of this survey that the board of the SARP should urgently elaborate, discuss, and propose novel and innovative concepts to solve the issue of castration of calves and lambs.
根据瑞士联邦动物保护和福利法,对动物进行的痛苦操作必须由兽医在局部或全身麻醉下进行,但某些特别列出的外科手术干预除外(动物保护附则第65条)。2001年9月1日,犊牛和羔羊的去势已从该例外清单中删除。从那时起,一些压力团体出于经济原因要求将这些干预措施委托给生产者。本文描述了一项针对此主题在瑞士反刍动物从业者协会(SARP)成员中进行的基于网络的调查结果。两份单独的问卷——一份针对犊牛,一份针对羔羊——作为pdf文件在SARP的主页(www.svwasmr.ch)上提供给SARP成员,为期3个月。在2002年12月31日,即提交完整问卷的截止日期,SARP成员由360名执业兽医组成。回复率为25%。几乎百分之百的回复兽医表示期望SARP发布关于犊牛和羔羊去势的指南。绝大多数人拒绝将去势委托给生产者,并进一步表示他们不准备为生产者进行的干预承担任何责任。然而,三分之一的回复兽医认为羔羊去势预期的工作量可能超过他们目前的能力。从这项调查结果可以得出结论,SARP董事会应紧急制定、讨论并提出新颖创新的概念,以解决犊牛和羔羊去势问题。