Suppr超能文献

卫生技术评估响应与经典卫生技术评估报告。

HTA responses and the classic HTA report.

作者信息

Milne Ruairidh, Clegg Andrew, Stevens Andrew

机构信息

Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7PX.

出版信息

J Public Health Med. 2003 Jun;25(2):102-6. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg023.

Abstract

Reports produced in response to the need for health technology assessment (HTA) vary greatly in the methods they use, depending on the decision-maker's needs, the technology's characteristics and the resources available. HTA reports vary from the brief, such as 'vignettes' produced when a new technology emerges, to the exhaustive, such as 'Cochrane reviews' synthesising a mature evidence base. They may address a wide range of different questions. 'Classic HTAs', typically those reports prepared to support NICE appraisal decisions, seek to use scientifically rigorous methods to address a focused policy question. These are based on systematic reviews of the effectiveness evidence but this is often fed into economic models, in order to generate estimates of cost-effectiveness. Future developments in HTA responses will reflect both the embedding of systematic methods and a growing responsiveness to customer needs.

摘要

为满足卫生技术评估(HTA)需求而编制的报告,其使用的方法差异很大,这取决于决策者的需求、技术的特点以及可用资源。HTA报告范围广泛,从新技术出现时产生的简短“案例”,到详尽的“Cochrane综述”(综合成熟的证据基础)。它们可能涉及各种各样不同的问题。“经典HTA”,通常是那些为支持英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)评估决策而编写的报告,试图运用科学严谨的方法来解决一个重点突出的政策问题。这些报告基于对有效性证据的系统评价,但通常会纳入经济模型,以便得出成本效益估计值。HTA应对措施的未来发展将既反映系统方法的融入,也体现对客户需求日益增强的响应能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验