Nakatani Satoshi, Stugaard Marie, Hanatani Akihisa, Katsuki Keiko, Kanzaki Hideaki, Yamagishi Masakazu, Kitakaze Masafumi, Miyatake Kunio
Cardiology Division of Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan.
Echocardiography. 2003 Feb;20(2):145-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8175.2003.03015.x.
Although left ventricular wall motion has been usually assessed with four-point scale (1 = normal; 2 = hypokinesis; 3 = akinesis; 4 = dyskinesis) based on the visual assessment, this method is only qualitative and subjective. Recently, a new echocardiographic system that enables calculation of myocardial strain rate based on tissue Doppler information has been developed. We investigated whether myocardial strain rate could quantify regional myocardial contraction in 17 patients with and without wall motion abnormalities including 6 patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography. Left ventricular short-axis wall motion was assessed with standard two-dimensional echocardiography at basal, mid-ventricular, and apical levels. The same levels were imaged with tissue Doppler method to determine regional myocardial strain rate. Sixty-four segments were judged normokinesis, 53 segments hypokinesis, and 18 segments akinesis at rest; 16 segments were judged normokinesis and 6 segments hypokinesis at stress. No segments characterized dyskinesis. Strain rates of normokinetic, hypokinetic, and akinetic wall segments at rest were significantly different each other (-2.0 +/- 0.6 for normokinesis,-0.6 +/- 0.5 for hypokinesis,P < 0.0001 vs. normokinesis, and-0.008 +/- 0.3 for akinesis, P < 0.0001 vs. normokinesis and hypokinesis). Further, strain rates well reflected the change in wall motion induced by dobutamine challenge: strain rates in the 15 segments revealing augmented wall motion changed from -2.0 +/- 0.7 to -4.7 +/- 1.7 (1/sec) (P < 0.0001) and those in the 7 segments revealing deteriorated or unchanged wall motion changed from -2.1 +/- 1.0 to -1.7 +/- 0.8 (1/sec) (P < 0.05). In conclusion, strain rate agreed well with assessed wall motion. Strain rate imaging may be a new powerful tool to quantify regional wall contraction.
尽管左心室壁运动通常是通过基于视觉评估的四点量表(1 = 正常;2 = 运动减弱;3 = 运动消失;4 = 运动障碍)来评估的,但这种方法只是定性和主观的。最近,一种能够根据组织多普勒信息计算心肌应变率的新型超声心动图系统已经开发出来。我们研究了心肌应变率是否能够量化17例有或无室壁运动异常患者的局部心肌收缩情况,其中包括6例接受多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图检查的患者。使用标准二维超声心动图在心底、心室中部和心尖水平评估左心室短轴壁运动。用组织多普勒方法对相同水平进行成像以确定局部心肌应变率。静息时,64个节段判定为运动正常,53个节段运动减弱,18个节段运动消失;负荷时,16个节段判定为运动正常,6个节段运动减弱。没有节段表现为运动障碍。静息时运动正常、运动减弱和运动消失的室壁节段的应变率彼此有显著差异(运动正常为-2.0±0.6,运动减弱为-0.6±0.5,与运动正常相比P<0.0001,运动消失为-0.008±0.3,与运动正常和运动减弱相比P<0.0001)。此外,应变率很好地反映了多巴酚丁胺激发引起的室壁运动变化:15个显示室壁运动增强的节段的应变率从-2.0±0.7变为-4.7±1.7(1/秒)(P<0.0001),7个显示室壁运动恶化或无变化的节段的应变率从-2.1±1.0变为-1.7±0.8(1/秒)(P<0.05)。总之,应变率与评估的室壁运动非常吻合。应变率成像可能是一种量化局部室壁收缩的新的有力工具。