Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开放乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎

Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.

作者信息

Lawrence David M, Pasquale Michael D, Wasser Thomas E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18105-1556, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2003 Jun;69(6):499-503; discussion 503-4.

Abstract

This study compared laparoscopic with open sigmoid colectomy for patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis. Increased use of less invasive techniques makes it vitally important to evaluate outcomes of these techniques as compared with standard open procedures. Patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis without hemorrhage (code 56211) between January 1997 and December 2001 were reviewed. Two groups were identified: those undergoing open sigmoid colectomy and those undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, operative time, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, morbidity/mortality, and hospital charges were compared. During the study period 271 sigmoid colectomies were performed for diverticulitis without hemorrhage: 56 laparoscopically and 215 with the standard open technique. Four patients required conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy. Mean ASA scores were: open group 2.4; laparoscopic group, 1.9 (P < 0.001). Mean operative times were: laparoscopic group, 170 +/- 45 minutes; open group, 140 +/- 49 minutes (P < 0.001). In the open group 39 patients required transfer to the ICU; one patient in the laparoscopic group required transfer to the ICU. Average hospital lengths of stay for the open and laparoscopic groups were 9.06 and 4.12 days, respectively (P < 0.001). Complications were recorded in 57 (27%) of 215 patients who underwent an open procedure versus 5 (9%) of 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy (P < 0.01). There were three deaths in the open group and none in laparoscopic group. Average total hospital charges were 25,700 dollars for open sigmoid colectomy and 17,414 dollars for laparoscopic colectomy. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy compares favorably with open sigmoid colectomy for patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis.

摘要

本研究比较了腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术与开放性乙状结肠切除术在憩室炎患者中的应用情况。与标准开放性手术相比,微创技术使用的增加使得评估这些技术的效果至关重要。对1997年1月至2001年12月期间因憩室炎而非出血接受乙状结肠切除术(编码56211)的患者进行了回顾。确定了两组:接受开放性乙状结肠切除术的患者和接受腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的患者;比较了美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、手术时间、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间、发病率/死亡率以及住院费用。在研究期间,共对271例因憩室炎而非出血进行了乙状结肠切除术:56例采用腹腔镜手术,215例采用标准开放性手术。4例患者需要从腹腔镜手术转为开放性结肠切除术。平均ASA评分如下:开放组为2.4;腹腔镜组为1.9(P<0.001)。平均手术时间如下:腹腔镜组为170±45分钟;开放组为140±49分钟(P<0.001)。开放组有39例患者需要转入ICU;腹腔镜组有1例患者需要转入ICU。开放组和腹腔镜组的平均住院时间分别为9.06天和4.12天(P<0.001)。215例接受开放性手术的患者中有57例(27%)记录有并发症,而56例接受腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的患者中有5例(9%)记录有并发症(P<0.01)。开放组有3例死亡,腹腔镜组无死亡病例。开放性乙状结肠切除术的平均总住院费用为25700美元,腹腔镜结肠切除术为17414美元。对于诊断为憩室炎的患者,腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术与开放性乙状结肠切除术相比具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验