Onishi Hiroshi, Kuriyama Kengo, Komiyama Takafumi, Tanaka Shiho, Ueki Junko, Sano Naoki, Araki Tsutomu, Ikenaga Satoshi, Tateda Yoshihito, Aikawa Yoshihito
Department of Radiology, Yamanashi Medical University, 1110 Shimokato Tamaho-cho, Nakakomna-gun, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.
Med Phys. 2003 Jun;30(6):1183-7. doi: 10.1118/1.1570372.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility of tumor position under patient deep inspiration self-breath-holding in the absence of respiratory monitoring devices, as well as to compare the reproducibility of deep inspiration self-breath-holding on the verbal command of a radiation technologist (Passive mode) with that initiated by patients' own estimation (Active mode). Twenty patients with lung cancer were shown how the tumor and diaphragm move during the respiration cycle. Patients were instructed to hold their breath during deep inspiration and reproduce identical tumor position as well as possible either by the Active mode or by the Passive mode. After patients had practiced self-breath-holding during deep inspiration, a set of three CT scans was obtained for each of the two modes of self-breath-holding (6 CT scans total) to obtain randomly timed images of 2 mm thickness in the vicinity of the tumor. The first three scans were performed during breath-hold using the Active mode, and next three scans were using the Passive mode. Maximum difference in tumor position for the three CT scans was then calculated along three axes: cranial-caudal (C-C); anterior-posterior (A-P); and right-left (R-L). In the 20 patients who underwent analysis of self-breath-holding, mean maximum difference in tumor position obtained under breath-hold using the Active and the Passive modes were: 2.2 and 3.1 mm along the C-C axis; 1.4 and 2.4 mm along the A-P axis; and 1.3 and 2.2 mm along the R-L axis, respectively. These differences in all axes were significantly smaller (p<0.05) for the Active mode than for the Passive mode. Most tumors displayed maximal respiratory movement along the C-C axis, and minimal movement along the R-L axis, but tumors located in the upper lung displayed maximal movement along the A-P axis. Significant correlation (p<0.05) was observed between differences along three axes in either mode of breath-hold. In conclusion, the reproducibility of tumor position under self-breath-holding by patients during deep inspiration after sufficient practice and in the absence of respiratory monitoring devices was satisfactorily accurate, and differences in tumor position were smaller under breath-holding using the Active mode than using the Passive mode. We believe this new technique is likely to prove extremely useful for the irradiation of lung tumors with a small internal margin and for reduced proportion of high-dose irradiated normal lung to total lung volume.
本研究的目的是评估在没有呼吸监测设备的情况下,患者深吸气屏气时肿瘤位置的可重复性,以及比较放射技师口头指令下的深吸气屏气(被动模式)与患者自行估算启动的深吸气屏气(主动模式)的可重复性。向20例肺癌患者展示了肿瘤和膈肌在呼吸周期中的移动情况。指导患者在深吸气时屏气,并尽可能通过主动模式或被动模式重现相同的肿瘤位置。在患者练习深吸气屏气后,针对两种屏气模式分别获取一组三次CT扫描(共6次CT扫描),以获取肿瘤附近2毫米厚的随机定时图像。前三次扫描在屏气期间使用主动模式进行,接下来的三次扫描使用被动模式。然后沿三个轴计算三次CT扫描的肿瘤位置最大差异:头脚方向(C-C);前后方向(A-P);左右方向(R-L)。在接受屏气分析的20例患者中,使用主动模式和被动模式屏气时获得的肿瘤位置平均最大差异分别为:沿C-C轴为2.2毫米和3.1毫米;沿A-P轴为1.4毫米和2.4毫米;沿R-L轴为1.3毫米和2.2毫米。主动模式下所有轴上的这些差异均显著小于被动模式(p<0.05)。大多数肿瘤沿C-C轴显示最大呼吸运动,沿R-L轴显示最小运动,但位于上肺的肿瘤沿A-P轴显示最大运动。在两种屏气模式下,沿三个轴的差异之间均观察到显著相关性(p<0.05)。总之,经过充分练习且在没有呼吸监测设备的情况下,患者深吸气屏气时肿瘤位置的可重复性令人满意地准确,并且使用主动模式屏气时肿瘤位置的差异小于使用被动模式时。我们认为这项新技术可能对具有小内边界的肺肿瘤放疗以及减少高剂量照射的正常肺占全肺体积的比例极为有用。