Suppr超能文献

阿罗洛尔与普萘洛尔治疗特发性震颤的多中心随机交叉多剂量比较研究。

A multicenter randomized crossover multiple-dose comparison study of arotinolol and propranolol in essential tremor.

作者信息

Lee Kwang-Soo, Kim Joong-Seok, Kim Jae-Woo, Lee Won-Yong, Jeon Beum-Seok, Kim Dongjae

机构信息

College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Kangnam St Mary Hospital, 505 Banpo-dong Seochu-Ku, 137-701 Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2003 Aug;9(6):341-7. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(03)00029-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A new medication is needed to treat essential tremor. Preliminary evidence suggests that arotinolol may be effective in the treatment of this disorder.

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of arotinolol and propranolol in a crossover, multiple dose comparative trial of patients with essential tremor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and seventy-five outpatients, with essential tremor were included in the study; 161 patients completed the study. Patients were identically evaluated at eight consecutive visits. The study consisted of two treatments, which were arranged according to a crossover design that evaluated the dose of each (arotinolol 10 mg per day and propranolol 40 mg per day, arotinolol 20 mg per day and propranolol 80 mg per day, arotinolol 30 mg per day and propranolol 160 mg per day). Each course of treatment lasted 6 weeks. Major outcome evaluations consisted of a self-reported disability scale, and motor performance score obtained before drug intake and 14 days after each treatment. The treatment effects were evaluated by analysis of variance using the Hills-Armitage test.

RESULTS

Arotinolol was found to be as effective as propranolol at reducing tremor. Drug effects as evaluated using motor-task performance scores revealed that arotinolol had a more significant effect than propranolol.

CONCLUSIONS

Arotinolol may be more useful than propranolol for the treatment of essential tremor.

摘要

背景

治疗特发性震颤需要一种新药。初步证据表明阿罗洛尔可能对治疗这种疾病有效。

目的

在一项特发性震颤患者的交叉、多剂量对比试验中研究阿罗洛尔和普萘洛尔的效果。

患者与方法

175例特发性震颤门诊患者纳入研究;161例患者完成研究。患者在连续8次就诊时接受相同评估。该研究包括两种治疗,按照交叉设计安排,评估每种治疗的剂量(阿罗洛尔每日10毫克和普萘洛尔每日40毫克、阿罗洛尔每日20毫克和普萘洛尔每日80毫克、阿罗洛尔每日30毫克和普萘洛尔每日160毫克)。每个疗程持续6周。主要结局评估包括一份自我报告的残疾量表,以及在每次服药前和服药14天后获得的运动表现评分。使用希尔斯 - 阿米蒂奇检验通过方差分析评估治疗效果。

结果

发现阿罗洛尔在减轻震颤方面与普萘洛尔效果相当。使用运动任务表现评分评估的药物效果显示,阿罗洛尔比普萘洛尔的效果更显著。

结论

在治疗特发性震颤方面,阿罗洛尔可能比普萘洛尔更有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验