• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于做出临终治疗决策的重病老年人来说,什么才是重要的?一项定性研究。

What matters to seriously ill older persons making end-of-life treatment decisions?: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Fried Terri R, Bradley Elizabeth H

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Unit, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2003 Apr;6(2):237-44. doi: 10.1089/109662103764978489.

DOI:10.1089/109662103764978489
PMID:12854940
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several methods exist to elicit end-of-life treatment preferences. However, little work has been done to elicit from patients themselves the aspects of treatment decision-making most important to them when making end-of-life treatment decisions.

METHODS

Participants consisted of 23 patients, 60 years of age and older with a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or cancer identified by their physicians as having a limited life expectancy. They took part in in-depth semistructured interviews and focus groups in which they were asked to discuss how they had made previous decisions about the treatment of their illness and/or would think about making future decisions. Transcripts were analyzed qualitatively using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

There were three major influences on treatment preferences: treatment burden, treatment outcome, and the likelihood of the outcome. Treatment burden was bearable if the outcome of treatment was desirable, but participants were less willing to endure the burden for more marginal outcomes. Certain outcomes were so unacceptable that they determined preference regardless of burden. However, some participants revealed that their willingness to tolerate these adverse outcomes may increase as their illness progresses. Although participants generally believed that physicians know with certainty the outcomes of treatment, most understood the concept of uncertainty, and the likelihood of a given outcome influenced their preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

A patient-centered approach to advance care planning needs to incorporate a consideration of both treatment burdens and treatment outcomes, including the likelihood of these outcomes. Patients' valuations of these outcomes may change over time.

摘要

背景

有多种方法可引出临终治疗偏好。然而,在让患者自己说出在做出临终治疗决策时对他们而言最重要的治疗决策方面,所做的工作很少。

方法

参与者包括23名年龄在60岁及以上的患者,他们的主要诊断为充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或被医生认定预期寿命有限的癌症。他们参与了深入的半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论,在讨论中他们被要求谈论自己此前如何做出关于疾病治疗的决策以及/或者会如何考虑做出未来的决策。使用持续比较法对访谈记录进行定性分析。

结果

对治疗偏好有三大影响因素:治疗负担、治疗结果以及结果的可能性。如果治疗结果理想,治疗负担是可以承受的,但参与者不太愿意为更微不足道的结果承受负担。某些结果是如此不可接受,以至于无论负担如何都决定了偏好。然而,一些参与者表示,随着病情进展,他们容忍这些不良结果的意愿可能会增加。虽然参与者普遍认为医生确切知道治疗结果,但大多数人理解不确定性的概念,特定结果的可能性会影响他们的偏好。

结论

以患者为中心的预立医疗计划方法需要同时考虑治疗负担和治疗结果,包括这些结果的可能性。患者对这些结果的评估可能会随时间而改变。

相似文献

1
What matters to seriously ill older persons making end-of-life treatment decisions?: A qualitative study.对于做出临终治疗决策的重病老年人来说,什么才是重要的?一项定性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2003 Apr;6(2):237-44. doi: 10.1089/109662103764978489.
2
Valuing the outcomes of treatment: do patients and their caregivers agree?重视治疗结果:患者及其护理人员意见一致吗?
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Sep 22;163(17):2073-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.17.2073.
3
Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients.了解重症患者的治疗偏好。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 4;346(14):1061-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012528.
4
Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness.晚期疾病老年患者维持生命治疗偏好的变化。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Apr;22(4):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0104-9.
5
A call for high-quality advance care planning in outpatients with severe COPD or chronic heart failure.呼吁在患有严重 COPD 或慢性心力衰竭的门诊患者中进行高质量的预先护理计划。
Chest. 2011 May;139(5):1081-1088. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1753. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
6
Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment.晚期疾病老年人对维持生命治疗的偏好随时间的不一致性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jul;55(7):1007-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01232.x.
7
The views of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on advance care planning: a qualitative study.严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对预先护理计划的看法:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2013 Mar;27(3):265-72. doi: 10.1177/0269216312440606. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
8
High satisfaction and low decisional conflict with advance care planning among chronically ill patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure using an online decision aid: A pilot study.使用在线决策辅助工具对晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病或心力衰竭慢性病患者进行预先护理计划的高满意度和低决策冲突:一项试点研究。
Chronic Illn. 2016 Sep;12(3):227-35. doi: 10.1177/1742395316633511. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
9
Barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care communication for patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者临终关怀沟通的障碍与促进因素
Chest. 2005 Jun;127(6):2188-96. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.6.2188.
10
Instability of Willingness to Accept Life-Sustaining Treatments in Patients With Advanced Chronic Organ Failure During 1 Year.晚期慢性器官衰竭患者在1年内接受维持生命治疗意愿的不稳定性
Chest. 2017 May;151(5):1081-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived Connections Between Personal Values and Health in High-Risk Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.患有多种疾病的高危患者对个人价值观与健康之间关联的认知:一项定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09448-z.
2
Patient Preferences in Metastatic Breast Cancer Care: A Scoping Review.转移性乳腺癌护理中的患者偏好:一项范围综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;15(17):4331. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174331.
3
ProPACC: Protocol for a Trial of Integrated Specialty Palliative Care for Critically Ill Older Adults.
ProPACC:一项针对危重症老年患者综合专科姑息治疗的试验方案。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):e601-e610. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.344.
4
An Online Training Program to Improve Clinicians' Skills in Communicating About Serious Illness.在线培训项目以提高临床医生在严重疾病沟通方面的技能。
Am J Crit Care. 2022 May 1;31(3):189-201. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022105.
5
Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in Oncology with a Focus on the Older Patient-A Systematic Review.肿瘤学中患者对治疗结果的偏好,重点关注老年患者——一项系统综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;14(5):1147. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051147.
6
'What matters to you?' Health outcome prioritisation in treatment decision-making for older patients.“对你来说重要的是什么?”老年患者治疗决策中的健康结果优先排序。
Age Ageing. 2021 Nov 10;50(6):2264-2269. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab160.
7
Prevalence of Treatment Burden in the Last Three Years of Life.生命最后三年的治疗负担的流行率。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Jun;24(6):879-886. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0170. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
8
Health-related preferences of older patients with multimorbidity: an evidence map.患有多种疾病的老年患者的健康相关偏好:一项证据图谱
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e034485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034485.
9
A systematic literature review of the assessment of treatment burden experienced by patients and their caregivers.患者及其照护者治疗负担评估的系统文献回顾。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Oct 11;19(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1222-z.
10
Measuring the burden of treatment for chronic disease: implications of a scoping review of the literature.衡量慢性病治疗负担:文献综述的影响
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 12;17(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0411-8.