Suppr超能文献

晚期疾病老年患者维持生命治疗偏好的变化。

Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness.

作者信息

Fried Terri R, Van Ness Peter H, Byers Amy L, Towle Virginia R, O'Leary John R, Dubin Joel A

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Apr;22(4):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0104-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting assumptions regarding how patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatment change over the course of serious illness.

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in treatment preferences over time.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study with 2-year follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred twenty-six community-dwelling persons age > or =60 years with advanced cancer, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants were asked, if faced with an illness exacerbation that would be fatal if untreated, whether they would: a) undergo high-burden treatment at a given likelihood of death and b) undergo low-burden treatment at a given likelihood of severe disability, versus a return to current health.

RESULTS

There was little change in the overall proportions of participants who would undergo therapy at a given likelihood of death or disability from first to final interview. Diversity within the population regarding the highest likelihood of death or disability at which the individual would undergo therapy remained substantial over time. Despite a small magnitude of change, the odds of participants' willingness to undergo high-burden therapy at a given likelihood of death and to undergo low-burden therapy at a given likelihood of severe cognitive disability decreased significantly over time. Greater functional disability, poorer quality of life, and lower self-rated life expectancy were associated with decreased willingness to undergo therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Diversity among older persons with advanced illness regarding treatment preferences persists over time. Although the magnitude of change is small, there is a decreased willingness to undergo highly burdensome therapy or to risk severe disability in order to avoid death over time and with declining health status.

摘要

背景

关于患者对维持生命治疗的偏好如何在重病过程中发生变化,存在相互矛盾的假设。

目的

研究治疗偏好随时间的变化。

设计

为期2年随访的纵向队列研究。

参与者

226名年龄≥60岁、患有晚期癌症、充血性心力衰竭或慢性阻塞性肺疾病的社区居民。

测量

询问参与者,如果面临疾病加重且不治疗将致命的情况,他们是否会:a)在给定的死亡可能性下接受高负担治疗,以及b)在给定的严重残疾可能性下接受低负担治疗,而非恢复到当前健康状态。

结果

从首次访谈至末次访谈,在给定的死亡或残疾可能性下愿意接受治疗的参与者总体比例几乎没有变化。随着时间推移,人群中关于个人愿意接受治疗的最高死亡或残疾可能性的多样性仍然很大。尽管变化幅度较小,但随着时间推移,参与者在给定的死亡可能性下愿意接受高负担治疗以及在给定的严重认知残疾可能性下愿意接受低负担治疗的几率显著降低。功能残疾程度更高、生活质量更差以及自我评定的预期寿命更低与接受治疗的意愿降低相关。

结论

患有晚期疾病的老年人在治疗偏好上的多样性随时间持续存在。尽管变化幅度较小,但随着时间推移以及健康状况下降,人们接受高负担治疗或冒着严重残疾风险以避免死亡的意愿降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e46c/2219611/f4953fc9392c/11606_2007_104_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Apr;22(4):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0104-9.
2
Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jul;55(7):1007-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01232.x.
3
5
Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 4;346(14):1061-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012528.
6
Predicting changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among patients with advanced chronic organ failure.
Chest. 2012 May;141(5):1251-1259. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1472. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
7
Instability of Willingness to Accept Life-Sustaining Treatments in Patients With Advanced Chronic Organ Failure During 1 Year.
Chest. 2017 May;151(5):1081-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
8
Valuing the outcomes of treatment: do patients and their caregivers agree?
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Sep 22;163(17):2073-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.17.2073.
9
Religion, risk, and medical decision making at the end of life.
J Aging Health. 2008 Aug;20(5):545-59. doi: 10.1177/0898264308317538. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
10
The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end-of-life.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22(11):1566-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0362-6. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

2
Cognitive and Functional Decline Among Long-Term Care Residents.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255635. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5635.
3
Anticoagulation at the end of life: whether, when, and how to treat.
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2024 Dec 6;2024(1):348-354. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2024000559.
4
Cognitive Trajectories in Older Adults Diagnosed With Hematologic Malignant Neoplasms.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2431057. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31057.
5
Psychosocial Factors Associated With Thoughts Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatment for Oneself and Family Members.
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Jun;21(6):646-654. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0032. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Frailty Assessment Can Enhance Current Risk Prediction Tools in Emergency Laparotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
World J Surg. 2023 Nov;47(11):2688-2697. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07140-z. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
8
Giving up on the objective of providing goal-concordant care: Advance care planning for improving caregiver outcomes.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Oct;70(10):3006-3011. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18000. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
9
National End-of-Life-Treatment Preferences are Stable Over Time: National Health and Aging Trends Study.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Oct;64(4):e189-e194. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
10
Thinking Ahead: Advance Care Planning for Patients With Cirrhosis.
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2021 Sep 13;19(1):7-11. doi: 10.1002/cld.1157. eCollection 2022 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective study of health status preferences and changes in preferences over time in older adults.
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Apr 24;166(8):890-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.8.890.
2
Focus group findings about the influence of culture on communication preferences in end-of-life care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Aug;20(8):703-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0151.x.
3
The standard gamble demonstrated lower reliability than the feeling thermometer.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 May;58(5):458-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.07.010.
4
Invariance and inconsistency in utility ratings.
Med Decis Making. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2):158-67. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05275399.
5
Enough. The failure of the living will.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Mar-Apr;34(2):30-42.
6
7
Stability of older adults' preferences for life-sustaining medical treatment.
Health Psychol. 2003 Nov;22(6):605-15. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.605.
9
10
Assessment of patient preferences: integrating treatments and outcomes.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Nov;57(6):S348-54. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.6.s348.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验