Seghers Petronella A L Nelleke, Wiersma Anke, Festen Suzanne, Stegmann Mariken E, Soubeyran Pierre, Rostoft Siri, O'Hanlon Shane, Portielje Johanneke E A, Hamaker Marije E
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;14(5):1147. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051147.
For physicians, it is important to know which treatment outcomes are prioritized overall by older patients with cancer, since this will help them to tailor the amount of information and treatment recommendations. Older patients might prioritize other outcomes than younger patients. Our objective is to summarize which outcomes matter most to older patients with cancer. A systematic review was conducted, in which we searched Embase and Medline on 22 December 2020. Studies were eligible if they reported some form of prioritization of outcome categories relative to each other in patients with all types of cancer and if they included at least three outcome categories. Subsequently, for each study, the highest or second-highest outcome category was identified and presented in relation to the number of studies that included that outcome category. An adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. In total, 4374 patients were asked for their priorities in 28 studies that were included. Only six of these studies had a population with a median age above 70. Of all the studies, 79% identified quality of life as the highest or second-highest priority, followed by overall survival (67%), progression- and disease-free survival (56%), absence of severe or persistent treatment side effects (54%), and treatment response (50%). Absence of transient short-term side effects was prioritized in 16%. The studies were heterogeneous considering age, cancer type, and treatment settings. Overall, quality of life, overall survival, progression- and disease-free survival, and severe and persistent side effects of treatment are the outcomes that receive the highest priority on a group level when patients with cancer need to make trade-offs in oncologic treatment decisions.
对于医生而言,了解老年癌症患者总体上优先考虑哪些治疗结果很重要,因为这将有助于他们调整信息的数量和治疗建议。老年患者可能会优先考虑与年轻患者不同的结果。我们的目标是总结对老年癌症患者最重要的结果。我们进行了一项系统综述,于2020年12月22日检索了Embase和Medline。如果研究报告了各类癌症患者中相对于彼此的某种结果类别优先级形式,并且纳入了至少三个结果类别,则这些研究符合条件。随后,对于每项研究,确定最高或第二高的结果类别,并根据纳入该结果类别的研究数量进行呈现。使用改编后的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。总共28项纳入研究询问了4374名患者的优先事项。其中只有6项研究的人群中位年龄在70岁以上。在所有研究中,79%将生活质量确定为最高或第二高的优先事项,其次是总生存期(67%)、无进展生存期和无病生存期(56%)、无严重或持续的治疗副作用(54%)以及治疗反应(50%)。16%的研究将无短暂短期副作用列为优先事项。这些研究在年龄、癌症类型和治疗环境方面存在异质性。总体而言,当癌症患者在肿瘤治疗决策中需要进行权衡时,生活质量、总生存期、无进展生存期和无病生存期以及治疗的严重和持续副作用是在群体层面上最受优先考虑的结果。