Kiel A W, Butler T, Alwitry A
Ophthalmology Department, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Eye (Lond). 2003 Jul;17(5):579-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700441.
(1). To test the consistency and ease with which number-plates of different component figures can be read under DVLA driving test conditions; (2). to test the relative difficulty of reading corresponding figures on registration plates of white and yellow backgrounds.Design Prospective study of consecutive eligible clinic patients.
Ophthalmology outpatients.
210 individuals with a corrected visual acuity with both eyes open of between 6/9 and 6/12.
The ability to read three different number-plates under standard DVLA driving-test conditions (ie at 20.5 m in good daylight with glasses if worn) and the ability to read identical number-plates against a white and a yellow background.
There is a significant difference between the ease with which three different number-plates can be read depending on their letter and numeral composition, although this did not seem to be significantly affected by whether they were printed on a yellow or white background. Only 92.3% of subjects could read all the number-plates at the legal distance, 96.7% could read at least one number-plate at the legal distance and 3.3% of the test subjects could not read any of the number-plates at 20.5 m.
The current test protocol used to obtain a driving licence and, moreover, the test the police will employ to assess visual competence to drive, is highly variable and is unlikely to give consistent repeatable results. The performance of those with equally good visual acuity is unpredictable and is highly dependent on the number-plate they are asked to read. This variability could exclude some who would otherwise pass the test or pass an individual with a visual acuity below accepted standards. The forthcoming changes in the regulations for design of number-plates is an ideal opportunity to standardise the whole testing procedure for driving visual acuity.
(1)测试在英国驾驶员与车辆牌照管理局(DVLA)驾驶考试条件下,不同组成数字的车牌的可辨识度及识别的难易程度;(2)测试在白色和黄色背景车牌上读取相应数字的相对难度。设计对连续符合条件的门诊患者进行前瞻性研究。
眼科门诊。
210名双眼睁开时矫正视力在6/9至6/12之间的个体。
在标准DVLA驾驶考试条件下(即在光线良好的白天,距离20.5米,若戴眼镜则佩戴眼镜)读取三种不同车牌的能力,以及在白色和黄色背景下读取相同车牌的能力。
根据字母和数字组成的不同,三种不同车牌的可辨识度存在显著差异,不过这似乎并未受到车牌是印在黄色还是白色背景上的显著影响。只有92.3%的受试者能够在法定距离读取所有车牌,96.7%的受试者能够在法定距离至少读取一个车牌,3.3%的受试对象在20.5米处无法读取任何一个车牌。
当前用于获取驾驶执照的测试方案,以及警方用于评估驾驶视觉能力的测试,具有高度变异性,不太可能给出一致的可重复结果。视力同样良好的人的表现不可预测,并且高度依赖于要求他们读取的车牌。这种变异性可能会排除一些原本可以通过测试的人,或者让视力低于公认标准的人通过测试。即将到来的车牌设计法规变化是规范驾驶视力整个测试程序的理想契机。