Saijo Nagahiro, Tamura Tomohide, Nishio Kazuto
National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;52 Suppl 1:S97-101. doi: 10.1007/s00280-003-0596-x. Epub 2003 Jun 18.
Progress in molecular pharmacology has demonstrated each anticancer drug to have a unique molecular target. Recent drug development has focused on compounds that specifically inhibit and/or modify tumor-specific molecular biological changes (target-based drug development). These compounds are generally classified as either small molecules or macromolecules. With the exception of antibodies, the majority of recently developed target-based drugs are small molecules. Assessing the effects of these compounds on their targets would probably help researchers to predict the antitumor effects of these anticancer drugs; however, actually assessing this hypothesis, even in preclinical models, is difficult. Most preclinical experiments attempt to show tumor growth inhibition or shrinkage, leading to a longer survival period or higher cure rate. Few experiments have examined the correlation between antitumor activity and the effect of a compound on its target. In phase I clinical trials of target-based drugs, the determination of maximum tolerated dose is not enough; the effect of the drug on its target should also be evaluated. Recently, dose-escalation strategies based on the effects of drugs on their targets have been proposed, even though an appropriate target effect is necessary but not sufficient to demonstrate clinical efficacy. Compounds that are not specifically directed against molecular targets on or within tumor cells, but against blood vessels, matrix, etc., usually do not cause tumor shrinkage. These compounds include angiogenesis inhibitors and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and are usually used in combination with other treatments at the start of clinical trials. Whether the methodology of clinical trials is sensitive enough to detect the subtle effects of these compounds remains uncertain. The effects of experimental drugs on their targets are rarely examined in clinical trials. Few data from translational studies are available and data obtained using surrogate tissues do not necessarily reflect the effects of the drugs on in situ tumors. Parameters such as time to progression, changes in tumor markers, and growth rates often vary significantly and are regarded as soft endpoints. Phase III trials evaluating survival benefit require extensive resources, including a large number of patients, a sophisticated data center, and well-trained study groups. The problems and future prospects of novel anticancer drug development are discussed.
分子药理学的进展表明,每种抗癌药物都有其独特的分子靶点。近期的药物研发聚焦于能够特异性抑制和/或改变肿瘤特异性分子生物学变化的化合物(基于靶点的药物研发)。这些化合物通常分为小分子或大分子。除抗体外,近期研发的大多数基于靶点的药物都是小分子。评估这些化合物对其靶点的作用可能有助于研究人员预测这些抗癌药物的抗肿瘤效果;然而,即使在临床前模型中,实际评估这一假设也很困难。大多数临床前实验试图展示肿瘤生长抑制或缩小,从而延长生存期或提高治愈率。很少有实验研究抗肿瘤活性与化合物对其靶点的作用之间的相关性。在基于靶点的药物的I期临床试验中,确定最大耐受剂量是不够的;还应评估药物对其靶点的作用。最近,有人提出了基于药物对其靶点的作用的剂量递增策略,尽管适当的靶点效应对于证明临床疗效是必要的,但并不充分。并非特异性针对肿瘤细胞上或肿瘤细胞内分子靶点,而是针对血管、基质等的化合物,通常不会导致肿瘤缩小。这些化合物包括血管生成抑制剂和基质金属蛋白酶抑制剂,通常在临床试验开始时与其他治疗联合使用。临床试验的方法是否足够灵敏以检测这些化合物的细微作用仍不确定。在临床试验中很少研究实验药物对其靶点的作用。转化研究的数据很少,使用替代组织获得的数据不一定能反映药物对原位肿瘤的作用。诸如疾病进展时间、肿瘤标志物变化和生长速率等参数往往差异很大,被视为软性终点。评估生存获益的III期试验需要大量资源,包括大量患者、一个复杂的数据中心和训练有素的研究团队。本文讨论了新型抗癌药物研发的问题和未来前景。