Suppr超能文献

不同的病例组合措施会影响对医疗服务提供者效率的评估吗?来自退伍军人事务部的经验教训。

Do different case-mix measures affect assessments of provider efficiency? Lessons from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

作者信息

Rosen Amy K, Loveland Susan A, Rakovski Carter C, Christiansen Cindy L, Berlowitz Dan R

机构信息

Center for Health Quality, Outcomes and Economic Research, Bedford VAMC, 200 Springs Road (152), Bedford, MA 01730, USA.

出版信息

J Ambul Care Manage. 2003 Jul-Sep;26(3):229-42. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200307000-00006.

Abstract

Although case-mix adjustment is critical for provider profiling, little is known regarding whether different case-mix measures affect assessments of provider efficiency. We examine whether two case-mix measures, Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACGs) and Diagnostic Cost Groups (DCGs), result in different assessments of efficiency across service networks within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Three profiling indicators examine variation in resource use. Although results from the ACGs and DCGs generally agree on which networks have greater or lesser efficiency than average, assessments of individual network efficiency vary depending upon the case-mix measure used. This suggests that caution should be used so that providers are not misclassified based on reported efficiency.

摘要

尽管病例组合调整对于医疗服务提供者的绩效评估至关重要,但对于不同的病例组合测量方法是否会影响对医疗服务提供者效率的评估,我们却知之甚少。我们研究了两种病例组合测量方法,即调整临床分组(ACG)和诊断成本分组(DCG),是否会导致退伍军人事务部(VA)内部不同服务网络的效率评估结果有所不同。三个绩效评估指标考察了资源使用的差异。虽然ACG和DCG的结果在哪些网络的效率高于或低于平均水平上总体一致,但根据所使用的病例组合测量方法,对各个网络效率的评估会有所不同。这表明应谨慎行事,以免根据报告的效率对医疗服务提供者进行错误分类。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验