• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调整后的临床分组病例组合系统对加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)初级医疗保健成本的适应能力:一项观察性研究。

Adaptive capacity of the Adjusted Clinical Groups Case-Mix System to the cost of primary healthcare in Catalonia (Spain): a observational study.

作者信息

Sicras-Mainar Antoni, Velasco-Velasco Soledad, Navarro-Artieda Ruth, Prados-Torres Alexandra, Bolibar-Ribas Buenaventura, Violan-Fors Concepción

机构信息

Directorate of Planning, Badalona Serveis Assistencials SA, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2012 Jun 25;2(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000941. Print 2012.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000941
PMID:22734115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3383978/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the adaptive capacity of the Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) system to the cost of care in primary healthcare centres in Catalonia (Spain).

DESIGN

Retrospective study (multicentres) conducted using computerised medical records.

SETTING

13 primary care teams in 2008 were included.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients registered in the study centres who required care between 1 January and 31 December 2008 were finally studied. Patients not registered in the study centres during the study period were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographic (age and sex), dependent (cost of care) and case-mix variables were studied. The cost model for each patient was established by differentiating the fixed and variable costs. To evaluate the adaptive capacity of the ACG system, Pearson's coefficient of variation and the percentage of outliers were calculated. To evaluate the explanatory power of the ACG system, the authors used the coefficient of determination (R(2)).

RESULTS

The number of patients studied was 227 235 (frequency: 5.9 visits per person per year), with a mean of 4.5 (3.2) episodes and 8.1 (8.2) visits per patient per year. The mean total cost was €654.2. The explanatory power of the ACG system was 36.9% for costs (56.5% without outliers). 10 ACG categories accounted for 60.1% of all cases and 19 for 80.9%. 5 categories represented 71% of poor performance (N=78 887, 34.7%), particularly category 0300-Acute Minor, Age 6+ (N=26 909, 11.8%), which had a coefficient of variation =139% and 6.6% of outliers.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACG system is an appropriate manner of classifying patients in routine clinical practice in primary healthcare centres in Catalonia, although improvements to the adaptive capacity through disaggregation of some categories according to age groups and, especially, the number of acute episodes in paediatric patients would be necessary to reduce intra-group variation.

摘要

目的

描述调整后的临床分组(ACG)系统对加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)初级医疗中心护理成本的适应能力。

设计

使用计算机化医疗记录进行的回顾性(多中心)研究。

设置

纳入了2008年的13个初级保健团队。

参与者

最终研究了2008年1月1日至12月31日期间在研究中心登记且需要护理的所有患者。排除在研究期间未在研究中心登记的患者。

观察指标

研究了人口统计学(年龄和性别)、相关指标(护理成本)和病例组合变量。通过区分固定成本和可变成本为每位患者建立成本模型。为评估ACG系统的适应能力,计算了Pearson变异系数和异常值百分比。为评估ACG系统的解释力,作者使用了决定系数(R²)。

结果

研究的患者数量为227235人(频率:每人每年5.9次就诊),每位患者每年平均有4.5(3.2)次发作和8.1(8.2)次就诊。平均总成本为654.2欧元。ACG系统对成本的解释力为36.9%(无异常值时为56.5%)。10个ACG类别占所有病例的60.1%,19个占80.9%。5个类别占表现不佳病例的71%(N = 78887,34.7%),特别是0300 - 急性轻症,6岁及以上(N = 26909,11.8%),其变异系数 = 139%,异常值占6.6%。

结论

ACG系统是加泰罗尼亚初级医疗中心常规临床实践中对患者进行分类的一种合适方式,尽管有必要通过根据年龄组对某些类别进行细分,尤其是儿科患者的急性发作次数,来提高适应能力,以减少组内变异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a18d/3383978/a3b7d48ac4a4/bmjopen-2012-000941fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a18d/3383978/cc49f76b02c2/bmjopen-2012-000941fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a18d/3383978/a3b7d48ac4a4/bmjopen-2012-000941fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a18d/3383978/cc49f76b02c2/bmjopen-2012-000941fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a18d/3383978/a3b7d48ac4a4/bmjopen-2012-000941fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Adaptive capacity of the Adjusted Clinical Groups Case-Mix System to the cost of primary healthcare in Catalonia (Spain): a observational study.调整后的临床分组病例组合系统对加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)初级医疗保健成本的适应能力:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Jun 25;2(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000941. Print 2012.
2
Obtaining the mean relative weights of the cost of care in Catalonia (Spain): retrospective application of the adjusted clinical groups case-mix system in primary health care.获取加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)护理成本的平均相对权重:调整后的临床分组病例组合系统在初级卫生保健中的回顾性应用。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;19(2):267-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01818.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
3
[Validating the Adjusted Clinical Groups [ACG] case-mix system in a Spanish population setting: a multicenter study].[在西班牙人群中验证调整后的临床分组(ACG)病例组合系统:一项多中心研究]
Gac Sanit. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):228-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.04.005. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
4
[Identification of pharmacy cost outliers in primary care].[基层医疗中药房成本异常值的识别]
Aten Primaria. 2009 Aug;41(8):453-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
5
Variability in prescription drug expenditures explained by adjusted clinical groups (ACG) case-mix: a cross-sectional study of patient electronic records in primary care.调整临床分组(ACG)病例组合对处方药支出变异性的解释:一项针对基层医疗中患者电子病历的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 4;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-53.
6
[Comparison of three methods for measuring multiple morbidity according to the use of health resources in primary healthcare].[根据初级医疗保健中卫生资源的使用情况对三种测量多种疾病发病率方法的比较]
Aten Primaria. 2012 Jun;44(6):348-57. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
7
[Measurement of relative cost weights as an effect of the retrospective application of adjusted clinical groups in primary care].[作为初级保健中调整后临床分组回顾性应用效果的相对成本权重测量]
Gac Sanit. 2006 Mar-Apr;20(2):132-41. doi: 10.1157/13087324.
8
Relationship between efficiency and clinical effectiveness indicators in an adjusted model of resource consumption: a cross-sectional study.调整资源消耗模型后的效率与临床效果指标之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 18;13:421. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-421.
9
Developing a dashboard to help measure and achieve the triple aim: a population-based cohort study.开发一个仪表板以帮助衡量并实现三重目标:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug 30;14:363. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-363.
10
[The development of ambulatory care groups in primary care].[基层医疗中门诊护理小组的发展]
Rev Neurol. 1999;29(7):667-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying individuals with complex and long-term health-care needs using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups System: A comparison of data from primary and specialist health care.使用约翰霍普金斯调整临床分组系统识别有复杂和长期医疗保健需求的个体:初级和专科医疗保健数据的比较。
Scand J Public Health. 2024 Jul;52(5):607-615. doi: 10.1177/14034948231166974. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
2
A systematic review of risk stratification tools internationally used in primary care settings.对国际上在基层医疗环境中使用的风险分层工具的系统评价。
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 23;4(3):e329. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.329. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Rx-defined morbidity groups and diagnosis- based risk adjusters for predicting healthcare costs in Taiwan.比较 Rx 定义的发病组和基于诊断的风险调整器,以预测台湾的医疗保健费用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 17;10:126. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-126.
2
An in-depth assessment of a diagnosis-based risk adjustment model based on national health insurance claims: the application of the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Group case-mix system in Taiwan.基于国民健康保险理赔的诊断为基础的风险调整模型的深入评估:约翰霍普金斯调整临床群组病例组合系统在台湾的应用。
BMC Med. 2010 Jan 18;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-7.
3
Medication, diagnostic, and cost information as predictors of high-risk patients in need of care management.
Population segmentation based on healthcare needs: a systematic review.
基于医疗需求的人群细分:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 13;8(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1105-6.
4
Developing a dashboard to help measure and achieve the triple aim: a population-based cohort study.开发一个仪表板以帮助衡量并实现三重目标:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug 30;14:363. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-363.
5
Association between fee-for-service expenditures and morbidity burden in primary care.初级保健中按服务收费支出与发病负担之间的关联。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Jul;15(6):599-610. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0499-7. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
药物治疗、诊断及费用信息作为需要护理管理的高危患者的预测指标。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jan;15(1):41-8.
4
Variability in prescription drug expenditures explained by adjusted clinical groups (ACG) case-mix: a cross-sectional study of patient electronic records in primary care.调整临床分组(ACG)病例组合对处方药支出变异性的解释:一项针对基层医疗中患者电子病历的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 4;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-53.
5
Adjusted Clinical Groups use as a measure of the referrals efficiency from primary care to specialized in Spain.调整后的临床分组用作衡量西班牙初级保健向专科转诊效率的指标。
Eur J Public Health. 2007 Dec;17(6):657-63. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm044. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
6
[Measurement of relative cost weights as an effect of the retrospective application of adjusted clinical groups in primary care].[作为初级保健中调整后临床分组回顾性应用效果的相对成本权重测量]
Gac Sanit. 2006 Mar-Apr;20(2):132-41. doi: 10.1157/13087324.
7
Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACGs) explain the utilization of primary care in Spain based on information registered in the medical records: a cross-sectional study.调整后的临床分组(ACGs)基于病历中记录的信息解释了西班牙初级保健的利用情况:一项横断面研究。
Health Policy. 2006 Mar;76(1):38-48. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.04.005. Epub 2005 Jun 8.
8
Comparison of the predictive validity of diagnosis-based risk adjusters for clinical outcomes.基于诊断的风险调整器对临床结局的预测效度比较。
Med Care. 2005 Jan;43(1):61-7.
9
Types of morbidity and categories of patients in a Swedish county. Applying the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups System to encounter data in primary health care.瑞典一个郡的发病类型和患者类别。将约翰霍普金斯调整临床分组系统应用于初级卫生保健中的就诊数据。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004 Sep;22(3):174-9. doi: 10.1080/02813430410006567.
10
Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in 'case' management.共病:对基层医疗在“病例”管理中的重要性的影响。
Ann Fam Med. 2003 May-Jun;1(1):8-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1.