• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男同性恋者和女同性恋者在与异性恋者互动中的经历及期望。

Gay men and lesbians' experiences in and expectations for interactions with heterosexuals.

作者信息

Conley Terri D, Devine Patricia G, Rabow Jerome, Evett Sophia R

机构信息

University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

J Homosex. 2002;44(1):83-109. doi: 10.1300/j082v44n01_05.

DOI:10.1300/j082v44n01_05
PMID:12856757
Abstract

We analyzed 97 gay men's and lesbians' experiences with and expectations for interactions with majority group members. Respondents described reactions to previous or imagined future interactions with an unfamiliar heterosexual person who had just become aware that the respondent was lesbian or gay. Results indicated that respondents are more proactive than reactive (in contrast to expectation states theories), that the contact hypothesis can be appropriately applied to this group, even though the formulation of the theory was based upon negative attitudes in the absence of extensive contact, and that they have different reactions for people of different prejudice levels, rather than being globally suspicious, as is predicted by many intergroup theories. Future research should direct more attention to the stigmatized group members' attitudes about and reactions toward the majority group.

摘要

我们分析了97名男同性恋者和女同性恋者与多数群体成员互动的经历及期望。受访者描述了对之前或想象中未来与刚意识到其为女同性恋或男同性恋的陌生异性互动的反应。结果表明,受访者更具主动性而非被动反应(与期望状态理论相反),接触假说可适用于该群体,尽管该理论的形成基于缺乏广泛接触时的负面态度,而且他们对不同偏见程度的人有不同反应,并非如许多群体间理论所预测的那样普遍持怀疑态度。未来的研究应更多关注受污名化群体成员对多数群体的态度及反应。

相似文献

1
Gay men and lesbians' experiences in and expectations for interactions with heterosexuals.男同性恋者和女同性恋者在与异性恋者互动中的经历及期望。
J Homosex. 2002;44(1):83-109. doi: 10.1300/j082v44n01_05.
2
Comparing Heterosexuals' and Gay Men/Lesbians' Responses to Relationship Problems and the Effects of Internalized Homophobia on Gay Men/Lesbians' Responses to Relationship Problems in Turkey.比较土耳其异性恋者与男同性恋者/女同性恋者对关系问题的反应以及内化恐同症对土耳其男同性恋者/女同性恋者关系问题反应的影响。
J Homosex. 2017;64(2):218-238. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1174028. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
3
Suicidal ideation in gay men and lesbians in South Korea: a test of the interpersonal-psychological model.韩国男同性恋者和女同性恋者的自杀意念:人际心理模型的检验
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2015 Feb;45(1):98-110. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12119. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
4
Attitudes, subjective experiences, and behaviors in imagined and actual encounters between gay and heterosexual people.同性恋者与异性恋者在想象和实际接触中的态度、主观体验及行为。
J Homosex. 2007;53(3):35-63. doi: 10.1300/J082v53n03_04.
5
Mating motives and concerns about being misidentified as gay or lesbian: implications for the avoidance and derogation of sexual minorities.交配动机和担心被误认为是同性恋:对避免和贬低性少数群体的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 May;40(5):633-45. doi: 10.1177/0146167214521467. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
6
Polymorphous prejudice: liberating the measurement of heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men.多形态偏见:解放对异性恋者对女同性恋者和男同性恋者态度的测量。
J Homosex. 2009;56(2):147-72. doi: 10.1080/00918360802623131.
7
Sexual orientation and personality.性取向与人格
Annu Rev Sex Res. 2005;16:119-53.
8
Interpersonal contact experiences with gay men: a qualitative investigation of "fag hags" and gay-supportive heterosexual men.与男同性恋者的人际接触经历:对“女同性恋者的男性朋友”和支持同性恋的异性恋男性的定性调查。
J Homosex. 2005;49(1):47-76. doi: 10.1300/J082v49n01_03.
9
Do Contact and Empathy Mitigate Bias Against Gay and Lesbian People Among Heterosexual First-Year Medical Students? A Report From the Medical Student CHANGE Study.接触和同理心能否减轻异性恋一年级医学生对同性恋者的偏见?来自医学生CHANGE研究的报告。
Acad Med. 2015 May;90(5):645-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000661.
10
The Role of Selection Effects in the Contact Hypothesis: Results from a U.S. National Survey on Sexual Prejudice.选择效应在接触假说中的作用:一项关于美国性偏见的全国性调查结果
Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Nov;44(8):2111-23. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0483-7. Epub 2015 Feb 18.