• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉背景对鸽子(家鸽)和人类(智人)图案辨别能力的不同影响。

Differential effects of visual context on pattern discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

作者信息

Kelly Debbie M, Cook Robert G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tufts University, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2003 Jun;117(2):200-8. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.2.200.

DOI:10.1037/0735-7036.117.2.200
PMID:12856790
Abstract

Three experiment examined the role of contextual information during line orientation and line position discriminations by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). Experiment 1 tested pigeons' performance with these stimuli in a target localization task using texture displays. Experiments 2 and 3 tested pigeons and humans, respectively, with small and large variations of these stimuli in a same-different task. Humans showed a configural superiority effect when tested with displays constructed from large elements but not when tested with the smaller, more densely packed texture displays. The pigeons, in contrast, exhibited a configural inferiority effect when required to discriminate line orientation, regardless of stimulus size. These contrasting results suggest a species difference in the perceptionand use of features and contextual information in the discrimination of line information.

摘要

三项实验研究了背景信息在鸽子(家鸽)和人类(智人)进行线条方向和线条位置辨别过程中的作用。实验1使用纹理显示在目标定位任务中测试鸽子对这些刺激的表现。实验2和实验3分别在异同任务中使用这些刺激的小变化和大变化来测试鸽子和人类。当用由大元素构成的显示进行测试时,人类表现出构型优势效应,但在用较小、排列更密集的纹理显示进行测试时则没有。相比之下,鸽子在被要求辨别线条方向时,无论刺激大小如何,都表现出构型劣势效应。这些对比结果表明,在辨别线条信息时,不同物种在特征和背景信息的感知与使用方面存在差异。

相似文献

1
Differential effects of visual context on pattern discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).视觉背景对鸽子(家鸽)和人类(智人)图案辨别能力的不同影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Jun;117(2):200-8. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.2.200.
2
A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).多维刺激分类的比较分析:I. 单维分类不一定意味着分析处理;来自鸽子(家鸽)、松鼠(卡罗来纳松鼠)和人类(智人)的证据。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):391-405. doi: 10.1037/a0016216.
3
Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).基于家族相似性构建的人工类别的辨别:人类(智人)与鸽子(家鸽)的比较研究
J Comp Psychol. 2007 Feb;121(1):22-33. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.22.
4
Further analysis of perception of the standard Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens): effects of length of brackets.鸽子(家鸽)和人类(智人)对标准缪勒-莱尔图形的感知的进一步分析:括号长度的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Aug;123(3):287-94. doi: 10.1037/a0016215.
5
A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: II. Strategic information search in humans (Homo sapiens) but not in pigeons (Columba livia).多维刺激分类的比较分析:II. 人类(智人)而非鸽子(家鸽)的策略性信息搜索
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):406-20. doi: 10.1037/a0016851.
6
Degree of representation of the matching concept in pigeons (Columba livia).鸽子(家鸽)中匹配概念的表征程度。
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Sep;117(3):246-56. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.246.
7
Orientation invariant pattern recognition by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).鸽子(家鸽)和人类(智人)的方向不变模式识别
J Comp Psychol. 1995 Sep;109(3):278-90. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.109.3.278.
8
Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).鸽子(家鸽)和人类(智人)对标准和倒置的缪勒-莱尔图形的感知。
J Comp Psychol. 2006 Aug;120(3):252-61. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.3.252.
9
Time discrimination in Columba livia and Homo sapiens.家鸽与人类的时间辨别
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Jan;18(1):80-94. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.18.1.80.
10
Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes.基于多种刺激类别的鸽子异同概念学习
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Oct;23(4):417-33. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.23.4.417.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptual grouping and detection of trial-unique emergent structures by pigeons.鸽子对试验独特突显结构的知觉分组和检测。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):717-729. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01586-1. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
2
The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: Pigeons (Columba livia) and crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) do not perceive emergent configurations.整体等于其各部分之和:鸽子(Columba livia)和乌鸦(Corvus macrorhynchos)无法感知涌现性构型。
Learn Behav. 2020 Mar;48(1):53-65. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00413-w.
3
Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.
鸟类和哺乳动物视觉认知中的实验性差异
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2015;10:73-105. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2015.100004.
4
The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.森林还是树木:蜜蜂的先前经验会逆转其对整体而非局部图像处理的偏好。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 22;282(1799):20142384. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2384.
5
Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.寻找鸽子中的返回抑制现象。
Learn Behav. 2005 Aug;33(3):296-308. doi: 10.3758/bf03192859.
6
Effects of identical context on visual pattern recognition by pigeons.相同情境对鸽子视觉模式识别的影响。
Learn Behav. 2005 Feb;33(1):90-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196053.