Suppr超能文献

纽约市男同性恋者和双性恋者中的无保护性行为:故意不安全行为出现的原因

Barebacking among gay and bisexual men in New York City: explanations for the emergence of intentional unsafe behavior.

作者信息

Halkitis Perry N, Parsons Jeffrey T, Wilton Leo

机构信息

Department of Applied Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2003 Aug;32(4):351-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1024095016181.

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess the frequency with which gay and bisexual men in New York City engage in intentional unprotected anal sex, or "barebacking," and to examine explanations about the emergence of barebacking. A total of 518 men completed a brief intercept survey. Of the 448 men who were familiar with the term "barebacking" 204 (45.5%) reported bareback sex in the past 3 months prior to assessment. HIV seropositive men were significantly more likely than HIV seronegative men to report this behavior and reported significantly more sexual partners with which they had engaged in intentional unprotected anal intercourse. Participants reported significantly more acts of seroconcordant bareback sex (intentional unprotected anal intercourse with a partner of the same HIV status) than those of serodiscordant bareback sex. Men who reported barebacking also reported significantly more benefits associated with this behavior. The Internet and the availability of sexually oriented chat rooms, HIV treatment advances, emotional fatigue regarding HIV, and the increased popularity of "club" drugs were commonly cited as reasons for the barebacking phenomenon.

摘要

本研究旨在评估纽约市男同性恋者和双性恋者进行故意无保护肛交(即“无保护性行为”)的频率,并探究无保护性行为出现的原因。共有518名男性完成了一项简短的拦截式调查。在448名熟悉“无保护性行为”一词的男性中,204人(45.5%)报告在评估前的过去3个月内有过无保护性行为。与HIV血清阴性的男性相比,HIV血清阳性的男性更有可能报告这种行为,且报告与之进行故意无保护肛交的性伴侣数量显著更多。参与者报告的血清学一致的无保护性行为(与HIV状态相同的伴侣进行故意无保护肛交)行为显著多于血清学不一致的无保护性行为。报告有无保护性行为的男性还报告称这种行为带来的益处显著更多。互联网、性取向聊天室的可用性、HIV治疗进展、对HIV的情绪疲劳以及“俱乐部”毒品日益流行等因素常被引为无保护性行为现象的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验