• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有精神障碍的成年人的既往青少年诊断:一项前瞻性纵向队列的发育随访研究

Prior juvenile diagnoses in adults with mental disorder: developmental follow-back of a prospective-longitudinal cohort.

作者信息

Kim-Cohen Julia, Caspi Avshalom, Moffitt Terrie E, Harrington HonaLee, Milne Barry J, Poulton Richie

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, England.

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Jul;60(7):709-17. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.709.

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.709
PMID:12860775
Abstract

BACKGROUND

If most adults with mental disorders are found to have a juvenile psychiatric history, this would shift etiologic research and prevention policy to focus more on childhood mental disorders.

METHOD

Our prospective longitudinal study followed up a representative birth cohort (N = 1037). We made psychiatric diagnoses according to DSM criteria at 11, 13, 15, 18, 21, and 26 years of age. Adult disorders were defined in the following 3 ways: (1) cases diagnosed using a standardized diagnostic interview, (2) the subset using treatment, and (3) the subset receiving intensive mental health services. Follow-back analyses ascertained the proportion of adult cases who had juvenile diagnoses and the types of juvenile diagnoses they had.

RESULTS

Among adult cases defined via the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, 73.9% had received a diagnosis before 18 years of age and 50.0% before 15 years of age. Among treatment-using cases, 76.5% received a diagnosis before 18 years of age and 57.5% before 15 years of age. Among cases receiving intensive mental health services, 77.9% received a diagnosis before 18 years of age and 60.3% before 15 years of age. Adult disorders were generally preceded by their juvenile counterparts (eg, adult anxiety was preceded by juvenile anxiety), but also by different disorders. Specifically, adult anxiety and schizophreniform disorders were preceded by a broad array of juvenile disorders. For all adult disorders, 25% to 60% of cases had a history of conduct and/or oppositional defiant disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Most adult disorders should be reframed as extensions of juvenile disorders. In particular, juvenile conduct disorder is a priority prevention target for reducing psychiatric disorder in the adult population.

摘要

背景

如果发现大多数患有精神障碍的成年人有青少年精神病史,这将使病因学研究和预防政策更多地聚焦于儿童期精神障碍。

方法

我们的前瞻性纵向研究对一个具有代表性的出生队列(N = 1037)进行了随访。我们依据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)标准在11岁、13岁、15岁、18岁、21岁和26岁时进行了精神疾病诊断。成人精神障碍按以下三种方式定义:(1)通过标准化诊断访谈确诊的病例;(2)接受治疗的子群体;(3)接受强化心理健康服务的子群体。回顾性分析确定了有青少年期诊断的成人病例的比例以及他们所患青少年期诊断的类型。

结果

在通过诊断访谈表定义的成人病例中,73.9%在18岁之前被诊断,50.0%在15岁之前被诊断。在接受治疗的病例中,76.5%在18岁之前被诊断,57.5%在15岁之前被诊断。在接受强化心理健康服务的病例中,77.9%在18岁之前被诊断,60.3%在15岁之前被诊断。成人精神障碍通常在青少年期同类障碍之前出现(例如,成人焦虑症之前有青少年焦虑症),但也有不同的障碍。具体而言,成人焦虑症和精神分裂症样障碍之前有一系列广泛的青少年期障碍。对于所有成人精神障碍,25%至60%的病例有品行和/或对立违抗障碍病史。

结论

大多数成人精神障碍应被重新界定为青少年精神障碍的延续。特别是,青少年品行障碍是减少成年人群体精神障碍的优先预防目标。

相似文献

1
Prior juvenile diagnoses in adults with mental disorder: developmental follow-back of a prospective-longitudinal cohort.患有精神障碍的成年人的既往青少年诊断:一项前瞻性纵向队列的发育随访研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Jul;60(7):709-17. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.709.
2
What do childhood anxiety disorders predict?儿童焦虑症能预测什么?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;48(12):1174-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01812.x.
3
Lifetime prevalence, correlates, and persistence of oppositional defiant disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.对立违抗障碍的终生患病率、相关因素及持续性:全国共病调查复制研究的结果
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;48(7):703-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01733.x.
4
Screening in early childhood for risk of later mental health problems: a longitudinal study.幼儿期心理健康问题风险筛查:一项纵向研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2008 Jul;42(8):694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
5
The Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI): 2. Usefulness in screening for child and adolescent psychopatholog.简短儿童与家庭电话访谈(BCFPI):2. 在筛查儿童和青少年精神病理学方面的效用
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;50(4):424-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01971.x. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
6
The Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI): 1. Rationale, development, and description of a computerized children's mental health intake and outcome assessment tool.简短儿童与家庭电话访谈(BCFPI):1. 一种计算机化儿童心理健康接诊与结果评估工具的基本原理、开发过程及描述。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;50(4):416-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01970.x. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
7
ADHD with comorbid oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder: discrete or nondistinct disruptive behavior disorders?患有对立违抗障碍或品行障碍共病的注意力缺陷多动障碍:是离散性还是非离散性破坏性行为障碍?
J Atten Disord. 2008 Sep;12(2):126-34. doi: 10.1177/1087054707308486. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
8
The long-term longitudinal course of oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder in ADHD boys: findings from a controlled 10-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study.注意缺陷多动障碍男孩中对立违抗障碍和品行障碍的长期纵向病程:一项为期10年的前瞻性对照纵向随访研究结果
Psychol Med. 2008 Jul;38(7):1027-36. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707002668. Epub 2008 Jan 21.
9
Childhood antecedent disorders to bipolar disorder in adults: a controlled study.成人双相情感障碍的儿童期前驱疾病:一项对照研究。
J Affect Disord. 2007 Apr;99(1-3):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
10
Prospectively ascertained child maltreatment and its association with DSM-IV mental disorders in young adults.前瞻性确定的儿童期虐待及其与年轻成年人中 DSM-IV 精神障碍的关联。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;67(7):712-9. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.71.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness comparison of an indicated child-centered group prevention program for disruptive behavior problems in children with vs. without co-occurring emotional problems.一项针对有或无并发情绪问题的儿童破坏性行为问题的以儿童为中心的特定群体预防项目的效果比较。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Sep 8;13(1):1005. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03392-7.
2
Comparing Youth With Bipolar Disorder to Non-Bipolar Youth Referred for Bipolar Disorder.将双相情感障碍青年与因双相情感障碍前来就诊的非双相情感障碍青年进行比较。
JAACAP Open. 2024 Sep 27;3(3):782-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.09.004. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Psychological distress and well-being in university and high school students: a cross-sectional study in Italy.
意大利大学生和高中生的心理困扰与幸福感:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):e101446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101446.
4
A Study on the Risk Factors of Abnormal Mental Health Status in General Physical Examination Population.普通体检人群心理健康状况异常的危险因素研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 12;18:4969-4977. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S521179. eCollection 2025.
5
Disruptive behavior and emotional problems in children screened in routine health care: prevalence and effectiveness of indicated prevention.常规医疗保健筛查中儿童的破坏性行为和情绪问题:针对性预防的患病率及效果
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2025 Aug 14;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00949-7.
6
Are the kids alright? Making sense of the current youth mental health crisis in Canada through heuristics and data.孩子们还好吗?通过启发法和数据来理解加拿大当前的青少年心理健康危机。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2025 Aug 14;50(4):E267-E274. doi: 10.1503/jpn.250115. Print 2025 Jul-Aug.
7
Asian American Parenting and Youth Mental Health Outcomes: A Literature Review.亚裔美国父母教养方式与青少年心理健康结果:文献综述
Mental Health Sci. 2025 Mar;3(1). doi: 10.1002/mhs2.101. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
8
Do You Like Me? Differences in Learning Social Cues in Adolescents with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD).你喜欢我吗?发育性语言障碍(DLD)青少年在学习社交线索方面的差异。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06984-9.
9
The etiological relationship between the general factors of psychopathology and personality; a longitudinal twin study from adolescence into young adulthood.精神病理学的一般因素与人格之间的病因学关系;一项从青春期到青年期的纵向双胞胎研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 8;16:1564305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1564305. eCollection 2025.
10
The Role of Perceived Social-Emotional Competence in Adolescents' Mental Health: The Longitudinal Mediating Effect of Peer Relationship and Teacher-Student Relationship.感知社会情感能力在青少年心理健康中的作用:同伴关系和师生关系的纵向中介效应
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Jul 15;18:1585-1593. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S531612. eCollection 2025.