• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培美曲塞联合顺铂与顺铂单药治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者的III期研究。

Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

作者信息

Vogelzang Nicholas J, Rusthoven James J, Symanowski James, Denham Claude, Kaukel E, Ruffie Pierre, Gatzemeier Ulrich, Boyer Michael, Emri Salih, Manegold Christian, Niyikiza Clet, Paoletti Paolo

机构信息

University of Chicago, Cancer Research Center, 5841 South Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2636-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.136.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2003.11.136
PMID:12860938
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, a rapidly progressing malignancy with a median survival time of 6 to 9 months, have previously responded poorly to chemotherapy. We conducted a phase III trial to determine whether treatment with pemetrexed and cisplatin results in survival time superior to that achieved with cisplatin alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients who were not eligible for curative surgery were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1. Both regimens were given intravenously every 21 days.

RESULTS

A total of 456 patients were assigned: 226 received pemetrexed and cisplatin, 222 received cisplatin alone, and eight never received therapy. Median survival time in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm was 12.1 months versus 9.3 months in the control arm (P =.020, two-sided log-rank test). The hazard ratio for death of patients in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm versus those in the control arm was 0.77. Median time to progression was significantly longer in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm: 5.7 months versus 3.9 months (P =.001). Response rates were 41.3% in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm versus 16.7% in the control arm (P <.0001). After 117 patients had enrolled, folic acid and vitamin B12 were added to reduce toxicity, resulting in a significant reduction in toxicities in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin and vitamin supplementation resulted in superior survival time, time to progression, and response rates compared with treatment with cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 significantly reduced toxicity without adversely affecting survival time.

摘要

目的

恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者病情进展迅速,中位生存时间为6至9个月,此前对化疗反应不佳。我们进行了一项III期试验,以确定培美曲塞和顺铂联合治疗是否能带来优于单纯顺铂治疗的生存时间。

患者与方法

未接受过化疗且不符合根治性手术条件的患者被随机分配,一组在第1天接受培美曲塞500mg/m²和顺铂75mg/m²,另一组在第1天仅接受顺铂75mg/m²。两种方案均每21天静脉给药一次。

结果

总共分配了456例患者:226例接受培美曲塞和顺铂联合治疗,222例仅接受顺铂治疗,8例未接受任何治疗。培美曲塞/顺铂组的中位生存时间为12.1个月,而对照组为9.3个月(P = 0.020,双侧对数秩检验)。培美曲塞/顺铂组患者死亡的风险比相对于对照组为0.77。培美曲塞/顺铂组的中位疾病进展时间明显更长:5.7个月对3.9个月(P = 0.001)。培美曲塞/顺铂组的缓解率为41.3%,而对照组为16.7%(P < 0.0001)。在117例患者入组后,添加了叶酸和维生素B12以降低毒性,培美曲塞/顺铂组的毒性显著降低。

结论

与单纯顺铂治疗相比,培美曲塞联合顺铂及维生素补充剂治疗可使恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者获得更长的生存时间、疾病进展时间和更高的缓解率。添加叶酸和维生素B12可显著降低毒性,且不影响生存时间。

相似文献

1
Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.培美曲塞联合顺铂与顺铂单药治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者的III期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2636-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.136.
2
Pemetrexed alone or in combination with cisplatin in previously treated malignant pleural mesothelioma: outcomes from a phase IIIB expanded access program.培美曲塞单药或联合顺铂用于既往治疗过的恶性胸膜间皮瘤:一项IIIB期扩大可及性项目的结果
J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Jul;1(6):506-12.
3
The use of chemotherapy in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and practice guideline.晚期恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者化疗的应用:一项系统评价与实践指南
J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Jul;1(6):591-601.
4
Phase III Study of Pemetrexed in Combination With Cisplatin Versus Cisplatin Alone in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.培美曲塞联合顺铂对比顺铂单药治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的 III 期临床研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 20;41(12):2125-2133. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02542.
5
Pemetrexed plus cisplatin or pemetrexed plus carboplatin for chemonaïve patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: results of the International Expanded Access Program.培美曲塞联合顺铂或培美曲塞联合卡铂用于初治恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者:国际扩大可及项目的结果
J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Jul;3(7):756-63. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31817c73d6.
6
Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma or non-small cell lung cancer.培美曲塞联合顺铂用于初治局部晚期或转移性恶性胸膜间皮瘤或非小细胞肺癌患者的Ⅰ期及药代动力学研究
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jan 1;15(1):382-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0128.
7
Second-line (post-study) chemotherapy received by patients treated in the phase III trial of pemetrexed plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in malignant pleural mesothelioma.在培美曲塞联合顺铂与单纯顺铂治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤的III期试验中接受二线(研究后)化疗的患者。
Ann Oncol. 2005 Jun;16(6):923-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi187. Epub 2005 Apr 11.
8
Phase II clinical trial of amatuximab, a chimeric antimesothelin antibody with pemetrexed and cisplatin in advanced unresectable pleural mesothelioma.抗间皮素嵌合抗体amatuximab联合培美曲塞和顺铂用于晚期不可切除性胸膜间皮瘤的II期临床试验
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 1;20(23):5927-36. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0804. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
9
Pemetrexed disodium in combination with cisplatin versus other cytotoxic agents or supportive care for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma.培美曲塞二钠联合顺铂与其他细胞毒性药物或支持治疗用于恶性胸膜间皮瘤的治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD005574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005574.pub2.
10
Comparison of cisplatin plus pemetrexed and cisplatin plus gemcitabine for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma in Japanese patients.顺铂联合培美曲塞与顺铂联合吉西他滨治疗日本恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者的疗效比较。
Respir Investig. 2014 Mar;52(2):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Inclusion of anti-vascular therapy as a promising option for later-line treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a retrospective study.将抗血管生成治疗作为恶性胸膜间皮瘤二线治疗的一种有前景选择:一项回顾性研究
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Aug 31;17(8):5687-5697. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-566. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
2
Pleural Mesothelioma: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment, Prognosis, and Survival.胸膜间皮瘤:发病机制、诊断、治疗、预后及生存情况
MedComm (2020). 2025 Sep 1;6(9):e70327. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70327. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
A Promising Prognostic Indicator for Pleural Mesothelioma: Pan-Immuno-Inflammation Value.
一种有前景的胸膜间皮瘤预后指标:全免疫炎症值。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 4;14(15):5467. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155467.
4
Inhibition of LDHB triggers DNA damage and increases cisplatin sensitivity in pleural mesothelioma.抑制LDHB会引发DNA损伤并增加胸膜间皮瘤对顺铂的敏感性。
Oncogenesis. 2025 Aug 11;14(1):28. doi: 10.1038/s41389-025-00571-4.
5
Pleural mesothelioma.胸膜间皮瘤
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Aug 7;11(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00640-3.
6
Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment on Survival of Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.手术治疗对恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者生存率的有效性
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;17(14):2360. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142360.
7
microRNA-497-5p-based screening identifies a novel synthetic lethal-type interaction via PKMYT1 and WEE1 in pleural mesothelioma.基于微小RNA-497-5p的筛选在胸膜间皮瘤中通过PKMYT1和WEE1鉴定出一种新型的合成致死型相互作用。
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2025 Jun 17;36(3):102610. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102610. eCollection 2025 Sep 9.
8
A novel mesothelioma molecular classification based on malignant cell differentiation.一种基于恶性细胞分化的新型间皮瘤分子分类。
Cancer Cell Int. 2025 Jun 24;25(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12935-025-03816-9.
9
8C7: A Fully Human Anti-PTGFRN Monoclonal Antibody-Drug Conjugate Inhibiting Tumour Growth of Mesothelioma and Paediatric Medulloblastoma Cell Lines.8C7:一种完全人源抗PTGFRN单克隆抗体药物偶联物,可抑制间皮瘤和小儿髓母细胞瘤细胞系的肿瘤生长。
J Cell Mol Med. 2025 Jun;29(12):e70665. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70665.
10
Molecular Insights into Pleural Mesothelioma: Unveiling Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.胸膜间皮瘤的分子见解:揭示致病机制与治疗机遇
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 24;15(11):1323. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111323.