Faiss Siegbert, Pape Ulrich-Frank, Böhmig Michael, Dörffel Yvonne, Mansmann Ulrich, Golder Werner, Riecken Ernst Otto, Wiedenmann Bertram
Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2689-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.142.
Somatostatin analogs and interferon alfa control hormone-active/functional neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors. In addition to hormonal control, variable degrees of antiproliferative effects for both agents have been reported. Until now, however, no prospective, randomized studies in therapy-naive patients have compared somatostatin analogs or interferon alfa alone with a combination of the two.
Eighty therapy-naive patients with histologically verified neuroendocrine tumor disease (primary localization: foregut, n = 36; midgut, n = 30; hindgut, n = 3; unknown, n = 11; functional, n = 29; nonfunctional, n = 51) were randomly treated either with lanreotide (1 mg three times a day administered subcutaneously [SC]) or interferon alfa (5 x 106 U three times a week SC) or both. All patients had disease progression in the 3 months before study entry, verified with imaging procedures.
Twenty-five patients were treated with lanreotide, 27 patients were treated with interferon alfa, and 28 patients were treated with the combination. Partial tumor remission was seen in four patients (one patient who received lanreotide, one patient who received interferon alfa, and two patients who received the combination). During the 12 months of therapy, stable disease was observed in 19 patients (seven patients who received lanreotide, seven patients who received interferon alfa, and five patients who received the combination), whereas tumor progression occurred in 14 of 25 patients (lanreotide), 15 of 27 patients (interferon alfa), and 14 of 28 patients (combination). Side effects leading to an interruption of therapy were more frequent in the combination group than in the monotherapy arms.
This prospective, randomized, multicenter study shows for the first time that somatostatin analogs, interferon alfa, or the combination of the two had comparable antiproliferative effects in the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors. Response rates were lower compared with those published in previous, nonrandomized studies. The antiproliferative effect of the tested substances was similar for functional and nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors.
生长抑素类似物和干扰素α可控制激素活性/功能性神经内分泌胃肠胰肿瘤。除了激素控制作用外,已有报道称这两种药物都有不同程度的抗增殖作用。然而,迄今为止,尚无针对初治患者的前瞻性随机研究比较单独使用生长抑素类似物或干扰素α与两者联合使用的效果。
80例初治且经组织学证实患有神经内分泌肿瘤疾病的患者(原发部位:前肠,n = 36;中肠,n = 30;后肠,n = 3;不明,n = 11;功能性,n = 29;非功能性,n = 51)被随机分为接受兰瑞肽治疗组(皮下注射1mg,每日3次)、干扰素α治疗组(皮下注射5×10⁶U,每周3次)或两者联合治疗组。所有患者在入组前3个月经影像学检查证实疾病进展。
25例患者接受兰瑞肽治疗,27例患者接受干扰素α治疗,28例患者接受联合治疗。4例患者出现部分肿瘤缓解(1例接受兰瑞肽治疗,1例接受干扰素α治疗,2例接受联合治疗)。在12个月的治疗期间,19例患者病情稳定(7例接受兰瑞肽治疗,7例接受干扰素α治疗,5例接受联合治疗),而25例接受兰瑞肽治疗的患者中有14例、27例接受干扰素α治疗的患者中有15例、28例接受联合治疗的患者中有14例出现肿瘤进展。联合治疗组导致治疗中断的副作用比单药治疗组更频繁。
这项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究首次表明,生长抑素类似物、干扰素α或两者联合在转移性神经内分泌胃肠胰肿瘤治疗中具有相当的抗增殖作用。与既往非随机研究报道的缓解率相比,本研究的缓解率较低。所测试物质对功能性和非功能性神经内分泌肿瘤的抗增殖作用相似。