Asplund Kjell, Ashburner Sharron, Cargill Kathy, Hux Margaret, Lees Ken, Drummond Michael
Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Spring;19(2):267-77. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000242.
Outcome in patients hospitalized for acute stroke varies considerably between populations. Within the framework of the GAIN International trial, a large multicenter trial of a neuroprotective agent (gavestinel, glycine antagonist), stroke outcome in relation to health care resource use has been compared in a large number of countries, allowing for differences in case mix.
This substudy includes 1,422 patients in 19 countries grouped into 10 regions. Data on prognostic variables on admission to hospital, resource use, and outcome were analyzed by regression models.
All results were adjusted for differences in prognostic factors on admission (NIH Stroke Scale, age, comorbidity). There were threefold variations in the average number of days in hospital/institutional care (from 20 to 60 days). The proportion of patients who met with professional rehabilitation staff also varied greatly. Three-month case fatality ranged from 11% to 28%, and mean Barthel ADL score at three months varied between 64 and 73. There was no relationship between health care resource use and outcome in terms of survival and ADL function at three months. The proportion of patients living at home at three months did not show any relationship to ADL function across countries.
There are wide variations in health care resource use between countries, unexplained by differences in case mix. Across countries, there is no obvious relationship between resource use and clinical outcome after stroke. Differences in health care traditions (treatment pathways) and social context seem to be major determinants of resource use. In making comparisons between countries, great care should be exercised in using outcome variables as indicators of quality of stroke care.
急性中风住院患者的预后在不同人群中差异很大。在GAIN国际试验的框架内,一项针对神经保护剂(加维斯替奈,甘氨酸拮抗剂)的大型多中心试验,已在大量国家比较了与医疗资源使用相关的中风预后情况,从而考虑了病例组合的差异。
这项子研究纳入了19个国家的1422例患者,分为10个区域。通过回归模型分析了入院时的预后变量、资源使用和预后的数据。
所有结果均针对入院时预后因素的差异(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表、年龄、合并症)进行了调整。住院/机构护理的平均天数存在三倍差异(从20天到60天)。接触专业康复人员的患者比例也有很大差异。三个月的病死率在11%至28%之间,三个月时的平均巴氏日常生活活动能力评分在64至73之间。在三个月的生存和日常生活活动功能方面,医疗资源使用与预后之间没有关系。三个月时在家居住的患者比例在各国之间与日常生活活动功能没有任何关系。
各国在医疗资源使用方面存在很大差异,病例组合的差异无法解释这些差异。在各国之间,中风后资源使用与临床预后之间没有明显关系。医疗传统(治疗途径)和社会背景的差异似乎是资源使用的主要决定因素。在进行国家间比较时,在将预后变量用作中风护理质量指标时应格外谨慎。