MacGregor E Anne, Brandes Jan, Eikermann Astrid
City of London Migraine Clinic, London, UK.
Headache. 2003 Jan;43(1):19-26. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03004.x.
The objectives of the Migraine And Zolmitriptan Evaluation (MAZE) survey were to assess the prevalence of migraine in the general population across 5 different countries, to understand migraineurs' experience of migraine and its management on a global level, and to assess patient perceptions and preferences of current and future treatment formulations.
A two-phase, international survey was performed in France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA, and involved a total of 5553 adults. In Phase I, >/=1000 adults from the general population in each country were interviewed by telephone using a routine consumer survey. The proportion of subjects meeting International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine was assessed using an adapted Kiel headache questionnaire, whereas the impact of migraine on daily life was assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) questionnaire. In Phase II, >/=100 clinically diagnosed migraineurs per country were recruited through their general practitioners and migraine clinics. Semi-structured interviews based on written questionnaires assessed the impact of, and attitudes toward, migraine and its treatments. Respondents also completed the MIDAS questionnaire. Patients also sampled a demonstrator version of the new orange-flavored orally disintegrating tablet of zolmitriptan.
Phase I: An estimated 5% to 12% of the population in the different countries were classified as suffering from migraine, with most attacks categorized as fairly severe to very severe. Between 23% and 42% of migraineurs reported>24 attacks in the previous 12 months. Approximately one-half of all migraineurs did not seek medical advice. Of those who did consult a physician, only 3% to 19% were prescribed triptans. In all countries, the most commonly used current treatment was simple analgesics (22% to 54%). Phase II: Current migraine therapy was consistently effective in only 19% to 31% of patients, and only 21% to 50% of patients were satisfied with their current treatment. Many sufferers supplemented their prescription therapy with alternative management strategies, including herbal and homeopathic remedies, stress management, relaxation therapy, avoidance of trigger factors, and bed rest. Patients indicated that the most important attributes of migraine therapies are high efficacy and rapid pain relief. When asked to identify delivery options that they would like to see more of in the future, most patients (73%) specified "a dissolve-in-the-mouth tablet." Ninety percent of patients who sampled the demonstrator version of the zolmitriptan orally disintegrating tablet considered it to be "very easy" to use, and 99% stated it was suitable for use "anytime/anywhere."
In the general population samples we surveyed, there was a 5% to 12% prevalence of migraine across 5 different countries. As reported from previous epidemiologic studies, we found that many migraineurs still do not consult a physician. Despite high levels of disability, as assessed by MIDAS scores and evidenced by the need for bed rest during attacks, many migraineurs continue to treat their headaches with simple analgesics, which, if ineffective, leads to dissatisfaction with treatment. Patients desire a medication with high efficacy and a rapid onset of action, and an orally disintegrating tablet such as that used for the new zolmitriptan formulation, is a favored formulation and route of administration.
偏头痛与佐米曲普坦评估(MAZE)调查的目的是评估5个不同国家普通人群中偏头痛的患病率,了解全球范围内偏头痛患者的偏头痛经历及其治疗情况,并评估患者对当前和未来治疗剂型的认知及偏好。
在法国、德国、意大利、英国和美国进行了一项分两阶段的国际调查,共涉及5553名成年人。在第一阶段,通过常规消费者调查,采用电话访谈每个国家≥1000名普通人群中的成年人。使用改编后的基尔头痛问卷评估符合国际头痛协会(IHS)偏头痛标准的受试者比例,而使用偏头痛残疾评估量表(MIDAS)问卷评估偏头痛对日常生活的影响。在第二阶段,通过其全科医生和偏头痛诊所招募每个国家≥100名临床诊断的偏头痛患者。基于书面问卷的半结构化访谈评估偏头痛及其治疗的影响和态度。受访者还完成了MIDAS问卷。患者还试用了佐米曲普坦新的橙色口味口腔崩解片的演示版本。
第一阶段:不同国家估计有5%至12%的人口被归类为患有偏头痛,大多数发作被归类为相当严重至非常严重。23%至42%的偏头痛患者报告在过去12个月内发作>24次。大约一半的偏头痛患者未寻求医疗建议。在那些咨询过医生的患者中,只有3%至19%被开了曲坦类药物。在所有国家,目前最常用的治疗方法是简单镇痛药(22%至54%)。第二阶段:目前的偏头痛治疗仅在19%至31%的患者中持续有效,只有21%至50%的患者对当前治疗满意。许多患者用替代管理策略补充其处方治疗,包括草药和顺势疗法、压力管理、放松疗法、避免触发因素和卧床休息。患者表示,偏头痛治疗最重要的属性是高疗效和快速缓解疼痛。当被要求确定他们希望在未来看到更多的给药方式时,大多数患者(73%)指定为“口腔崩解片”。试用佐米曲普坦口腔崩解片演示版本的患者中有90%认为其“非常容易”使用,99%表示其适合“随时随地”使用。
在我们调查的普通人群样本中,5个不同国家偏头痛的患病率为5%至12%。正如先前流行病学研究所报告的,我们发现许多偏头痛患者仍未咨询医生。尽管根据MIDAS评分评估且在发作期间需要卧床休息证明残疾程度很高,但许多偏头痛患者仍继续用简单镇痛药治疗头痛,若无效则会导致对治疗的不满。患者渴望一种具有高疗效和快速起效的药物,而一种口腔崩解片,如用于新佐米曲普坦剂型的那种,是一种受欢迎的剂型和给药途径。