Ringqvist Margareta, Walker-Engström Marie-Louise, Tegelberg Ake, Ringqvist Ivar
Associate professor of clinical orthodontics, Centre for Clinical Research, Central Hospital, Uppsala University, Västerås, Sweden.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jul;124(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00240-3.
The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to analyze dental and skeletal side effects after 4 years of treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with a mandibular advancement device (MAD) compared with uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP). With the appliance in position, the mandible was advanced 50% of maximum protrusion capacity (ie, 4-6 mm); the vertical opening between the incisal edges was, on average, 3 mm. Thirty patients in the MAD group and 37 in the UPPP group completed the 4-year follow-up. There were no differences between the MAD and the UPPP groups in any of the dental or skeletal variables measured after the 4-year treatment period. In the MAD group, small but statistically significant changes were found: there was a posterior rotation of the mandible (mandibular line [ML]/nasion-sella line [NSL]) (mean 0.5 degrees [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.8 degrees ]). Correlated to the posterior rotation of the mandible, the distances incision superius ML, incision superius-NSL, and incision inferius-NSL increased by means (95% CI) of 0.7 (0.5-1.2), 0.8 (0.4-1.1), and 1.3 (0.8-1.8) mm, respectively. Overjet and overbite did not change significantly, nor was there a significant change in the mandibular length. The observed changes were considered clinically insignificant because overbite and overjet stayed within normal limits. Only the vertical position of the maxillary incisors in relation to ML changed to the extent that the 95% CI of the mean for the change was outside that of the mean of the change in the UPPP group and measurement error. Treatment of OSA with a dental appliance is probably a lifelong process, and long-term follow-up studies should therefore be undertaken to control both the treatment effect on OSA and the side effects on the masticatory system.
这项前瞻性随机研究的目的是分析使用下颌前移装置(MAD)治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者4年后与悬雍垂腭咽成形术(UPPP)相比的牙齿和骨骼副作用。装置就位时,下颌向前推进至最大前突能力的50%(即4 - 6毫米);切缘之间的垂直开口平均为3毫米。MAD组30例患者和UPPP组37例患者完成了4年的随访。在4年治疗期后测量的任何牙齿或骨骼变量方面,MAD组和UPPP组之间均无差异。在MAD组中,发现了虽小但具有统计学意义的变化:下颌发生向后旋转(下颌线[ML]/鼻根 - 蝶鞍线[NSL])(平均0.5度[95%置信区间(CI)0.1 - 0.8度])。与下颌向后旋转相关,ML上切牙、ML - NSL上切牙以及NSL下切牙之间的距离分别平均增加(95%CI)0.7(0.5 - 1.2)、0.8(0.4 - 1.1)和1.3(0.8 - 1.8)毫米。覆盖和覆合没有显著变化,下颌长度也没有显著变化。观察到的变化被认为在临床上无显著意义,因为覆合和覆盖仍在正常范围内。只有上颌切牙相对于ML的垂直位置发生了变化,以至于该变化均值的95%CI超出了UPPP组变化均值和测量误差的范围。使用牙矫治器治疗OSA可能是一个终身过程,因此应该进行长期随访研究,以控制对OSA的治疗效果以及对咀嚼系统的副作用。