Fett William F, Cooke Peter H
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, USA.
J Food Prot. 2003 Jul;66(7):1158-65. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-66.7.1158.
Alfalfa sprouts contaminated with the bacterial pathogens Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella have been the source of numerous outbreaks of foodborne illness in the United States and in other countries. The seed used for sprouting appears to be the primary source of these pathogens. The aim of this study was to determine whether the efficacy of commercial citrus-related products for sanitizing sprouting seed is similar to that of high levels of chlorine. Five products (Citrex, Pangermex, Citricidal, Citrobio, and Environné) were tested at concentrations of up to 20,000 ppm in sterile tap water and compared with buffered chlorine (at 16,000 ppm). Alfalfa seeds were inoculated with four-strain cocktails of Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 to give final initial concentrations of ca. 9.0 and 7.0 CFU/g, respectively. Treatments (10 min) with Citrex, Pangermex, and Citricidal at 20,000 ppm and chlorine at 16,000 ppm produced similar log reductions for alfalfa seed inoculated with four-strain cocktails of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella (3.42 to 3.46 log CFU/g and 3.56 to 3.74 log CFU/g, respectively), and all four treatments were significantly (P<0.05) more effective than the control treatment (a buffer wash). Citrobio at 20,000 ppm was as effective as the other three products and chlorine against Salmonella but not against E. coli O157:H7. Environné was not more effective (producing reductions of 2.2 to 2.9 log CFU/g) than the control treatment (which produced reductions of 2.1 to 2.3 log CFU/g) against either pathogen. None of the treatments reduced seed germination. In vitro assays, as well as transmission electron microscopy, confirmed the antibacterial nature of the products that were effective against the two pathogens and indicated that they were bactericidal. When used at 20,000 ppm, the effective citrus-related products may be viable alternatives to chlorine for the sanitization of sprouting seed pending regulatory approval.
被细菌病原体大肠杆菌O157:H7和沙门氏菌污染的苜蓿芽已成为美国和其他国家众多食源性疾病暴发的源头。用于发芽的种子似乎是这些病原体的主要来源。本研究的目的是确定商业柑橘类相关产品对发芽种子进行消毒的效果是否与高浓度氯相似。在无菌自来水中以高达20000 ppm的浓度测试了五种产品(Citrex、Pangermex、Citricidal、Citrobio和Environné),并与缓冲氯(16000 ppm)进行比较。用沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌O157:H7的四菌株混合物接种苜蓿种子,最终初始浓度分别约为9.0和7.0 CFU/g。用20000 ppm的Citrex、Pangermex和Citricidal以及16000 ppm的氯处理(10分钟),对接种了大肠杆菌O157:H7和沙门氏菌四菌株混合物的苜蓿种子产生了相似的对数减少量(分别为3.42至3.46 log CFU/g和3.56至3.74 log CFU/g),并且所有四种处理均显著(P<0.05)比对照处理(缓冲液冲洗)更有效。20000 ppm的Citrobio对沙门氏菌的效果与其他三种产品和氯相同,但对大肠杆菌O157:H7无效。Environné对任何一种病原体的效果都不比对照处理(产生2.1至2.3 log CFU/g的减少量)更有效(产生2.2至2.9 log CFU/g的减少量)。没有一种处理会降低种子发芽率。体外试验以及透射电子显微镜证实了对这两种病原体有效的产品的抗菌性质,并表明它们具有杀菌作用。在获得监管批准之前,当以20000 ppm使用时,有效的柑橘类相关产品可能是用于发芽种子消毒的氯的可行替代品。