Lakartidningen. 2003 Jun 26;100(26-27):2284-6.
This review focused on answering the following questions: 1. At what level of hearing loss can hearing aids be of sufficient benefit to motivate testing and prescribing? 2. What is known about the value of the various technical features in modern hearing aids?
English language literature was searched for the period 1990 through December 2002 using Medline. The scientific quality of the retrieved literature was assessed by two reviewers.
Hearing aids benefit mainly those with moderate to severe hearing loss. Hearing aids amplify sound but do not provide normal hearing. In regard to sound quality and benefits in daily life, non-linear technology is better than linear. There is no evidence that digital hearing aids are superior to modern analog hearing aids. No clinical trials have shown that two hearing aids are superior to one hearing aid.
The need for further scientific studies is substantial.
本综述着重回答以下问题:1. 听力损失达到何种程度时,助听器能带来足够益处从而促使进行测试和开具处方?2. 关于现代助听器各种技术特性的价值有哪些了解?
使用Medline检索1990年至2002年12月期间的英文文献。由两名评审员评估检索到的文献的科学质量。
助听器主要对中度至重度听力损失者有益。助听器放大声音,但无法提供正常听力。在音质和日常生活益处方面,非线性技术优于线性技术。没有证据表明数字助听器优于现代模拟助听器。没有临床试验表明双耳佩戴助听器优于单耳佩戴助听器。
开展进一步科学研究的需求很大。