Pilling Michael, Wiggett Alison, Ozgen Emre, Davies Ian R L
University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jun;31(4):538-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03196095.
Roberson and Davidoff (2000) found that color categorical perception (CP; better cross-category than within-category discrimination) was eliminated by verbal, but not by visual, interference presented during the interstimulus interval (ISI) of a discrimination task. On the basis of this finding, Roberson and Davidoff concluded that CP was mediated by verbal labels, and not by perceptual mechanisms, as is generally assumed. Experiment 1 replicated their results. However, it was found that if the interference type was uncertain on each trial (Experiment 2), CP then survived verbal interference. Moreover, it was found that the target color name could be retained across the ISI even with verbal interference (Experiment 3). We therefore conclude that color CP may indeed involve verbal labeling but that verbal interference does not necessarily prevent it.
罗伯逊和达维多夫(2000年)发现,在辨别任务的刺激间隔(ISI)期间呈现的言语干扰而非视觉干扰消除了颜色范畴知觉(CP;跨范畴辨别优于范畴内辨别)。基于这一发现,罗伯逊和达维多夫得出结论,与通常所认为的相反,CP是由言语标签介导的,而非由知觉机制介导。实验1重复了他们的结果。然而,研究发现,如果每次试验的干扰类型不确定(实验2),那么CP就能在言语干扰下留存下来。此外,研究还发现,即使存在言语干扰,目标颜色名称在ISI期间也能够被保留(实验3)。因此,我们得出结论,颜色CP可能确实涉及言语标记,但言语干扰不一定会阻止它。