Franklin Anna, Wright Oliver, Davies Ian R L
Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Surrey GU2 5XH, UK.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Feb;102(2):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
We comment on Goldstein, Davidoff, and Roberson's replication and extension (Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 219-238 [2009]) of our study of the effect of toddlers' color term knowledge on their categorical perception (CP) of color (Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 114-141 [2005]). First, we discuss how best to assess color term knowledge when concerned with the effects of language on color CP. A reanalysis of our data indicates that even toddlers who do not know the terms for the relevant focal colors still show CP. Second, we comment on Goldstein and colleagues' finding of blue-purple CP, as we did, but not of blue-green CP in Himba toddlers. We present contrasting data from Wright (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Surrey, 2006) that demonstrates blue-green CP in Himba toddlers. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the approach taken by all of these investigations and discuss theoretical accounts of the origin and nature of color CP.
我们对戈德斯坦、达维多夫和罗伯逊对我们关于幼儿颜色词知识对其颜色范畴知觉(CP)影响的研究的重复及扩展研究(《实验儿童心理学杂志》,第102卷,第219 - 238页[2009年])发表评论。该原始研究发表于《实验儿童心理学杂志》,第90卷,第114 - 141页[2005年])。首先,我们讨论在关注语言对颜色CP的影响时,如何最好地评估颜色词知识。对我们数据的重新分析表明,即使是那些不知道相关焦点颜色术语的幼儿仍然表现出颜色范畴知觉。其次,我们对戈德斯坦及其同事发现的辛巴幼儿存在蓝 - 紫颜色范畴知觉进行评论,就像我们之前做的那样,但他们未发现辛巴幼儿存在蓝 - 绿颜色范畴知觉。我们展示了赖特(未发表的博士论文,萨里大学,2006年)的对比数据,该数据表明辛巴幼儿存在蓝 - 绿颜色范畴知觉。最后,我们讨论所有这些研究采用方法的局限性,并讨论颜色范畴知觉的起源和本质的理论解释。