• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考科蓝新生儿系统评价:新生儿治疗证据调查

Cochrane neonatal systematic reviews: a survey of the evidence for neonatal therapies.

作者信息

Sinclair John C, Haughton Diane E, Bracken Michael B, Horbar Jeffrey D, Soll Roger F

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Medical Centre, Room 3N11F, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Perinatol. 2003 Jun;30(2):285-304. doi: 10.1016/s0095-5108(03)00025-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0095-5108(03)00025-3
PMID:12875355
Abstract

A survey is reported of 113 systematic reviews of therapies in neonatology, based on 559 eligible randomized trials in total. These reviews were prepared by the CNRG and were published in the Cochrane Library, Issue 3,2001. The median number of included trials per review was 3 (range 0 to 32) and participants 207 (range 0 to 5460). Among 90 reviews with a categorical primary outcome, the median number of outcome events per review was 54 (range 1 to 1284). Among reviews finding a statistically significant benefit of treatment, the effect size was large (median relative risk 0.55, range 0.09 to 0.93). Reviews of surfactant for prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome were able to detect moderate-sized treatment effects (median relative risk 0.85) because of the large number and size of trials in this field. Among many reviews finding no evidence of treatment effect, large and potentially important benefits or harms could not be excluded. Most CNRG reviews were current. There is a continuing need to prepare systematic review of therapies not yet covered and to keep an increasing number of reviews up-to-date.

摘要

本文报道了一项对113篇新生儿科治疗方法系统评价的调查,这些评价基于总共559项符合条件的随机试验。这些评价由CNRG编写,并发表在《Cochrane图书馆》2001年第3期。每项评价纳入试验的中位数为3项(范围0至32项),参与者为207名(范围0至5460名)。在90项有分类主要结局的评价中,每项评价结局事件的中位数为54个(范围1至1284个)。在发现治疗有统计学显著益处的评价中,效应量较大(中位数相对危险度为0.55,范围0.09至0.93)。由于该领域试验数量多且规模大,关于表面活性剂预防和治疗呼吸窘迫综合征的评价能够检测到中等大小的治疗效果(中位数相对危险度为0.85)。在许多未发现治疗效果证据的评价中,不能排除存在大的且可能重要的益处或危害。大多数CNRG评价是最新的。仍持续需要编写尚未涵盖的治疗方法的系统评价,并使越来越多的评价保持更新。

相似文献

1
Cochrane neonatal systematic reviews: a survey of the evidence for neonatal therapies.考科蓝新生儿系统评价:新生儿治疗证据调查
Clin Perinatol. 2003 Jun;30(2):285-304. doi: 10.1016/s0095-5108(03)00025-3.
2
[Bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews in the Neonatal Cochrane Collaboration. Its role in evidence-based decision making in neonatology].[新生儿科Cochrane协作网系统评价的文献计量学分析。其在新生儿学循证决策中的作用]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2004 May;60(5):417-27. doi: 10.1016/s1695-4033(04)78300-9.
3
Updating reviews: the experience of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.更新综述:考科蓝新生儿综述小组的经验
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;22 Suppl 1:29-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00909.x.
4
[Neonatal neurology decision-making starting from systematic reviews of Cochrane Collaboration].[基于Cochrane协作网系统评价的新生儿神经病学决策制定]
Rev Neurol. 2005;40(8):453-9.
5
The role of developing countries in generating Cochrane meta-analyses in the field of pediatrics (neonatology and neuropediatrics): a systematic analysis.发展中国家在儿科领域(新生儿学和神经儿科学)开展Cochrane系统评价中的作用:一项系统分析。
World Health Popul. 2013;14(2):24-32. doi: 10.12927/whp.2013.23272.
6
The typical Cochrane review. How many trials? How many participants?典型的Cochrane系统评价。有多少项试验?有多少参与者?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Fall;18(4):820-3. doi: 10.1017/s0266462302000624.
7
Systematic Cochrane reviews in neonatology: a critical appraisal.系统评价在新生儿学中的应用:批判性评价。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2013 Aug;54(4):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
8
Use of systematic reviews of randomised trials by Australian neonatologists and obstetricians.澳大利亚新生儿科医生和产科医生对随机试验系统评价的使用情况。
Med J Aust. 1998 Mar 16;168(6):267-70. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb140159.x.
9
Evidence-based therapy in neonatology: distilling the evidence and applying it in practice.新生儿科的循证治疗:提炼证据并将其应用于实践。
Acta Paediatr. 2004 Sep;93(9):1146-52.
10
Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews.将系统评价转换为Cochrane格式:对澳大利亚系统评价作者的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan 17;3(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-3-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' perceptions of core outcomes in neonatal research in two Nigerian neonatal units.尼日利亚两个新生儿病房中父母对新生儿研究核心结果的看法。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020 Jun 4;4(1):e000669. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000669. eCollection 2020.
2
A systematic review identifying common data items in neonatal trials and assessing their completeness in routinely recorded United Kingdom national neonatal data.一项系统综述,旨在识别新生儿试验中的常见数据项,并评估其在英国常规记录的国家新生儿数据中的完整性。
Trials. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):731. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3849-7.
3
Developing, implementing and disseminating a core outcome set for neonatal medicine.
制定、实施和传播新生儿医学的核心结局集。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017 Jul 26;1(1):e000048. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000048. eCollection 2017.
4
Do trials reduce uncertainty? Assessing impact through cumulative meta-analysis of neonatal RCTs.试验能否降低不确定性?通过对新生儿随机对照试验的累积荟萃分析评估影响。
J Perinatol. 2017 Nov;37(11):1215-1219. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.126. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
5
Advantages of Bayesian monitoring methods in deciding whether and when to stop a clinical trial: an example of a neonatal cooling trial.贝叶斯监测方法在决定是否以及何时停止临床试验中的优势:以新生儿低温治疗试验为例
Trials. 2016 Jul 22;17(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1480-4.
6
A paediatrician's guide to clinical trials units.儿科医生临床试验单位指南
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2016 Oct;101(5):265-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310036. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
7
Does aggressive phototherapy increase mortality while decreasing profound impairment among the smallest and sickest newborns?积极的光疗是否会增加最小和最病重的新生儿的死亡率,同时降低其严重损伤的发生率?
J Perinatol. 2012 Sep;32(9):677-84. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.64. Epub 2012 May 31.
8
Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews.Cochrane新生儿综述组系统评价的报告与方法学质量
BMC Pediatr. 2009 Jun 17;9:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-38.
9
So what has the Cochrane Collaboration ever done for us? A report card on the first 10 years.那么考科蓝协作网究竟为我们做了些什么呢?一份关于头十年的成绩单。
CMAJ. 2004 Sep 28;171(7):747-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041255.