Leite Luiz R, Fenelon Guilherme, Simoes Aloyr, Silva Georgia G, Friedman Paul A, de Paola Angelo A V
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Jun;14(6):567-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02278.x.
This study assessed the role of electrophysiologic testing to identify therapeutic strategies for the treatment of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy treated with amiodarone or sotalol.
One hundred fifteen patients [69 men (60%); mean age 52 +/- 10 years] with chagasic cardiomyopathy presenting with symptomatic VT were studied after loading with Class III antiarrhythmic drugs; 78 had a history of sustained VT, and 37 with symptomatic nonsustained VT had sustained VT induced at baseline electrophysiologic study. All but 12 patients also underwent baseline electrophysiologic study. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.49 +/- 0.14. Based on results of electrophysiologic study after loading with Class III drugs, patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 23) had no sustained VT induced; group 2 (n = 45) had only tolerated sustained VT induced; and group 3 (n = 47) had hemodynamically unstable sustained VT induced. After a mean follow-up of 52 +/- 32 months, total mortality rate was 39.1%; it was significantly higher in group 3 than in groups 2 and 1 [69%, 22.2%, and 26%, respectively, P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 10.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8, 21.8]. There was no significant difference in total mortality rate between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.40, HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.75, 4.58). Cardiac mortality and sudden cardiac death rates also were higher in group 3 patients.
In patients with chagasic cardiomyopathy and sustained VT, electrophysiologic testing can predict long-term efficacy of Class III antiarrhythmic drugs. This may help in the selection of patients for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.
本研究评估了电生理检查在确定使用胺碘酮或索他洛尔治疗持续性室性心动过速(VT)和慢性恰加斯心肌病患者的治疗策略中的作用。
115例[69例男性(60%);平均年龄52±10岁]患有恰加斯心肌病且伴有症状性VT的患者在接受Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物负荷后进行了研究;78例有持续性VT病史,37例有症状性非持续性VT的患者在基线电生理检查时诱发了持续性VT。除12例患者外,所有患者均接受了基线电生理检查。平均左心室射血分数为0.49±0.14。根据Ⅲ类药物负荷后的电生理检查结果,患者被分为三组:第1组(n = 23)未诱发持续性VT;第2组(n = 45)仅能耐受诱发的持续性VT;第3组(n = 47)诱发了血流动力学不稳定的持续性VT。平均随访52±32个月后,总死亡率为39.1%;第3组显著高于第2组和第1组[分别为69%、22.2%和26%,P < 0.0001,风险比(HR)10.4,95%置信区间(CI)3.8,21.8]。第1组和第2组之间的总死亡率无显著差异(P = 0.40,HR 1.5,95% CI 0.75,4.58)。第3组患者的心脏死亡率和心源性猝死率也更高。
在患有恰加斯心肌病和持续性VT的患者中,电生理检查可预测Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物的长期疗效。这可能有助于选择植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的患者。