Suppr超能文献

胺碘酮治疗心肌梗死后持续性室性心动过速:长期随访、风险评估及程序心室刺激的预测价值

Amiodarone therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: long-term follow-up, risk assessment and predictive value of programmed ventricular stimulation.

作者信息

Maury P, Zimmermann M, Metzger J, Reynard C, Dorsaz P, Adamec R

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2000 Nov-Dec;76(2-3):199-210. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(00)00379-x.

Abstract

We determine the value of the programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) and of clinical, angiographic and electrophysiologic variables in assessing the long-term risk of arrhythmia recurrence in a group of coronary artery diseased patients presenting with a first episode of monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) treated with amiodarone. Mortality and arrhythmia recurrence rates were retrospectively assessed in 55 consecutive patients with previous myocardial infarction presenting with a first VT episode. Results of left heart catheterization, echocardiography and time-domain signal-averaging were collected. Patients underwent PVS after amiodarone oral loading and were classified according to inducibility before being all discharged on amiodarone (200 mg daily). The mean follow-up was 42+/-31 months. Total and cardiac mortality rates were 29% (16 patients) and 23% (13 patients) respectively. Sudden death (SD) occurred in nine patients (16%). VT recurred in 13 patients (23%). Sustained monomorphic VT was inducible in 40 patients (72%) after amiodarone loading. Neither total mortality (10/40 vs. 6/15) nor cardiac mortality (3/40 vs. 1/15) were significantly different between inducible and non-inducible patients. Recurrent VT rate was 27% (11/40 patients) for the inducible group and 13% (2/15 patients) for the non-inducible group (NS). SD occurred in 6/40 inducible patients (15%) and in 2/15 non-inducible patients (13%) (NS). Arrhythmic events occurred in 42% (17/40) inducible patients vs. 26% (4/15) non-inducible patients (P=0.07). Parameters correlated with outcome were ejection fraction (EF) (5 SD/11 patients with EF <0.3 vs. 4/44 with EF >0.3, P=0.003), mitral insufficiency (MI) (4 SD/10 patients with MI vs. 4/44 patients without MI, P=0.004) and age (65+/-9 years for patients with VT recurrence vs. 58+/-9, P=0.02). Although the risk stratification can be improved, reliable and safe long-term prediction of recurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmia in individual patients cannot be made. Consequently, the systematic implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in case of a first episode of sustained VT occurring in coronary artery disease patients should be further debated.

摘要

我们评估程序性心室刺激(PVS)以及临床、血管造影和电生理变量在一组首次发生单形性持续性室性心动过速(VT)并接受胺碘酮治疗的冠心病患者中评估心律失常复发长期风险的价值。对55例既往有心肌梗死且首次发生VT的连续患者的死亡率和心律失常复发率进行回顾性评估。收集左心导管检查、超声心动图和时域信号平均的结果。患者在口服胺碘酮负荷后接受PVS,并根据能否诱发出VT进行分类,之后全部出院并接受胺碘酮治疗(每日200mg)。平均随访时间为42±31个月。总死亡率和心脏死亡率分别为29%(16例患者)和23%(13例患者)。9例患者(16%)发生猝死(SD)。13例患者(23%)VT复发。40例患者(72%)在胺碘酮负荷后可诱发出持续性单形性VT。可诱发和不可诱发患者之间的总死亡率(10/40对6/15)和心脏死亡率(3/40对1/15)均无显著差异。可诱发组的VT复发率为27%(11/40例患者),不可诱发组为13%(2/15例患者)(无统计学意义)。6/40例可诱发患者(15%)和2/15例不可诱发患者(13%)发生SD(无统计学意义)。42%(17/40)的可诱发患者与26%(4/15)的不可诱发患者发生心律失常事件(P = 0.07)。与预后相关的参数为射血分数(EF)(EF<0.3的患者中有5例SD/11例,EF>0. 的患者中有4例/44例,P = 0.003)、二尖瓣关闭不全(MI)(有MI的患者中有4例SD/10例,无MI的患者中有4例/44例,P = 0.004)和年龄(VT复发患者为65±9岁, vs. 58±9岁,P = 0.02)。虽然风险分层可以改进,但无法对个体患者恶性室性心律失常复发进行可靠且安全的长期预测。因此,对于冠心病患者首次发生持续性VT时系统性植入心脏复律除颤器这一问题应进一步探讨。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验