• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估管理式医疗研究中的可靠性和有效性测量方法。

Assessing reliability and validity measures in managed care studies.

作者信息

Montoya Isaac D

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 3104 Edloe, Suite 330, Houston TX 77027, USA.

出版信息

Clin Lab Sci. 2003 Summer;16(3):153-62; quiz 163-5.

PMID:12875489
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To review the reliability and validity literature and develop an understanding of these concepts as applied to managed care studies.

RESULTS

Reliability is a test of how well an instrument measures the same input at varying times and under varying conditions. Validity is a test of how accurately an instrument measures what one believes is being measured.

METHODS

A review of reliability and validity instructional material was conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies of managed care practices and programs abound. However, many of these studies utilize measurement instruments that were developed for other purposes or for a population other than the one being sampled. In other cases, instruments have been developed without any testing of the instrument's performance. The lack of reliability and validity information may limit the value of these studies. This is particularly true when data are collected for one purpose and used for another. The usefulness of certain studies without reliability and validity measures is questionable, especially in cases where the literature contradicts itself

摘要

背景

回顾可靠性和有效性文献,并深入理解这些概念在管理式医疗研究中的应用。

结果

可靠性是对一种工具在不同时间和不同条件下测量相同输入的效果的检验。有效性是对一种工具测量人们认为正在被测量的事物的准确程度的检验。

方法

对可靠性和有效性教学材料进行了综述。

结论

关于管理式医疗实践和项目的研究大量存在。然而,这些研究中有许多使用的测量工具是为其他目的或针对与所抽样人群不同的人群开发的。在其他情况下,工具的开发没有对其性能进行任何测试。缺乏可靠性和有效性信息可能会限制这些研究的价值。当数据为一个目的收集却用于另一个目的时尤其如此。某些没有可靠性和有效性测量的研究的有用性值得怀疑,特别是在文献相互矛盾的情况下。

相似文献

1
Assessing reliability and validity measures in managed care studies.评估管理式医疗研究中的可靠性和有效性测量方法。
Clin Lab Sci. 2003 Summer;16(3):153-62; quiz 163-5.
2
Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)所采用测量方法的可靠性和有效性。
Soz Praventivmed. 2001;46 Suppl 1:S3-42.
3
Reliability and validity in a nutshell.信度与效度概述。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Dec;18(23):3237-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02939.x.
4
Using existing population-based data sets to measure the American Academy of Pediatrics definition of medical home for all children and children with special health care needs.利用现有的基于人群的数据集,衡量美国儿科学会对所有儿童及有特殊医疗保健需求儿童的医疗之家定义。
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5 Suppl):1529-37.
5
Measuring patient satisfaction for the Quality and Outcomes Framework.衡量质量与结果框架下的患者满意度。
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Sep;57(542):737-40.
6
Validation of the Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care instrument.《巴塞尔护理服务配给程度量表》的验证
Nurs Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;56(6):416-24. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000299853.52429.62.
7
The design and assessment of questionnaires in clinical research.临床研究中问卷的设计与评估。
Singapore Med J. 2001 Mar;42(3):131-5.
8
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
9
Development and validation of an objective instrument to measure surgical performance at tonsillectomy.
Laryngoscope. 2005 Dec;115(12):2127-37. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000178329.23359.30.
10
Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.质量调整生命年在儿科护理中缺乏质量:对已发表的儿童健康成本效用研究的批判性综述。
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):e600-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2127.