Liberman Laura, Morris Elizabeth A, Dershaw D David, Abramson Andrea F, Tan Lee K
Breast Imaging Section, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Aug;181(2):519-25. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810519.
The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and positive predictive value of ductal enhancement among MR imaging-detected breast lesions that had biopsy and to assess the histologic findings associated with ductal enhancement.
Retrospective review was performed of 427 nonpalpable, mammographically occult lesions that had MR imaging-guided needle localization and surgical biopsy. Lesions were reviewed by one radiologist who was unaware of the histologic outcomes and were classified according to a standardized lexicon. MR imaging and histologic findings of ductal enhancing lesions were reviewed.
Ductal enhancement accounted for 88 (21%) of 427 lesions and 88 (59%) of 150 nonmass lesions. Histologic finding in these 88 lesions were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 18 (20%); infiltrating carcinoma in five (6%), including three with DCIS; lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) in nine (10%); atypical ductal hyperplasia in eight (9%); and benign in 48 (55%). Among the 48 benign lesions, the dominant histologic findings were fibrocystic change (n = 16); ductal hyperplasia (n = 8); fibrosis (n = 8); postbiopsy change (n = 5); benign breast tissue (n = 3); sclerosing adenosis (n = 2); and single cases of fibroadenoma, fibroadenomatoid change, lymph node, mastitis, papilloma, and radial scar. Factors associated with a trend toward a higher frequency of carcinoma included clumped enhancement (p = 0.05) and synchronous ipsilateral cancer (p = 0.07).
Ductal enhancement accounted for 21% of MR imaging-detected lesions that had biopsy and had a positive predictive value of 26%. Differential diagnosis of ductal enhancement includes carcinoma (usually DCIS); atypical ductal hyperplasia; LCIS; and benign findings such as fibrocystic change, ductal hyperplasia, and fibrosis.
本研究旨在确定在接受活检的磁共振成像(MR)检测出的乳腺病变中导管强化的患病率和阳性预测值,并评估与导管强化相关的组织学发现。
对427例通过MR成像引导下针定位和手术活检的不可触及、乳腺X线摄影隐匿性病变进行回顾性研究。由一位不知晓组织学结果的放射科医生对病变进行评估,并根据标准化词汇表进行分类。对导管强化病变的MR成像和组织学发现进行回顾。
427例病变中,导管强化占88例(21%),150例非肿块病变中占88例(59%)。这88例病变的组织学发现为:导管原位癌(DCIS)18例(20%);浸润性癌5例(6%),其中3例合并DCIS;小叶原位癌(LCIS)9例(10%);非典型导管增生8例(9%);良性病变48例(55%)。在48例良性病变中,主要组织学发现为纤维囊性变(n = 16);导管增生(n = 8);纤维化(n = 8);活检后改变(n = 5);良性乳腺组织(n = 3);硬化性腺病(n = 2);以及各1例的纤维腺瘤、纤维腺病样改变、淋巴结、乳腺炎、乳头状瘤和放射状瘢痕。与癌发生率呈升高趋势相关的因素包括强化聚集(p = 0.05)和同侧同步癌(p = 0.07)。
导管强化在接受活检的MR成像检测出的病变中占21%,阳性预测值为26%。导管强化的鉴别诊断包括癌(通常为DCIS);非典型导管增生;LCIS;以及良性表现,如纤维囊性变、导管增生和纤维化。