• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态对比增强和扩散加权磁共振成像鉴别良性和恶性非肿块强化病变诊断准确性的最新系统评价和荟萃分析

An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Contrast Enhancement and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Non-Mass Enhancement Lesions.

作者信息

Tarigan Vera Nevyta, Kusumaningtyas Nungky, Supit Nina I S H, Sanjaya Edwin, Chandra Malvin, Sulay Callistus Bruce Henfry, Octavius Gilbert Sterling

机构信息

Breast and Female Reproductive Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang 15811, Indonesia.

Department of Radiology, Siloam Hospital Kebon Jeruk, Jakarta 11530, Indonesia.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 30;14(13):4628. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134628.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14134628
PMID:40649002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12250181/
Abstract

: This study systematically evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. : The literature search started and ended on 10 June 2024. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Our research question could be formulated as "In women with NME detected by MRI, how accurate are DCE and DWI in ruling in and ruling out malignancy when the diagnosis is compared to histopathology analysis with or without a clinical follow-up?". The meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 17 software with the "midas" commands. The study protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database. : Fifty-four studies involving 6121 NME lesions were analyzed. The combined use of DCE-MRI and DWI demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.88-0.93), followed by DWI alone (AUC: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.81-0.87) and ADC (AUC: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.74-0.81). DCE-MRI alone showed the lowest performance (AUC: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.64-0.72). Significant heterogeneity was observed across all modalities, with I values exceeding 95% in several analyses. The likelihood ratio scattergram indicated that no modality reliably confirmed or excluded malignancy. : While the combination of DCE-MRI and DWI achieves the highest diagnostic accuracy, no modality can reliably differentiate benign from malignant NME lesions. Standardized imaging protocols and refined diagnostic descriptors are needed for clinical improvement.

摘要

本研究系统评估了动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)、扩散加权成像(DWI)及表观扩散系数(ADC)值的诊断准确性。文献检索于2024年6月10日开始并结束。我们检索了MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、Pubmed、Science Direct和谷歌学术。我们的研究问题可表述为“在MRI检测出NME的女性中,与有或无临床随访的组织病理学分析相比,DCE和DWI在诊断和排除恶性肿瘤方面的准确性如何?”。使用STATA 17软件及“midas”命令进行荟萃分析。该研究方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)数据库中注册。分析了涉及6121个NME病变的54项研究。DCE-MRI和DWI联合使用显示出最高的诊断准确性(AUC:0.91;95%CI:0.88 - 0.93),其次是单独使用DWI(AUC:0.85;95%CI:0.81 - 0.87)和ADC(AUC:0.77;95%CI:0.74 - 0.81)。单独的DCE-MRI表现最差(AUC:0.68;95%CI:0.64 - 0.72)。在所有模式中均观察到显著的异质性,在几项分析中I值超过95%。似然比散点图表明,没有一种模式能可靠地确诊或排除恶性肿瘤。虽然DCE-MRI和DWI联合使用可达到最高的诊断准确性,但没有一种模式能可靠地区分良性和恶性NME病变。需要标准化的成像方案和完善的诊断描述符以改善临床情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1194/12250181/611c471d67c1/jcm-14-04628-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1194/12250181/04414128f1d0/jcm-14-04628-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1194/12250181/800c75dba85b/jcm-14-04628-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1194/12250181/daaf839962cf/jcm-14-04628-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1194/12250181/611c471d67c1/jcm-14-04628-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1194/12250181/04414128f1d0/jcm-14-04628-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1194/12250181/800c75dba85b/jcm-14-04628-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1194/12250181/daaf839962cf/jcm-14-04628-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1194/12250181/611c471d67c1/jcm-14-04628-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Contrast Enhancement and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Non-Mass Enhancement Lesions.动态对比增强和扩散加权磁共振成像鉴别良性和恶性非肿块强化病变诊断准确性的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 30;14(13):4628. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134628.
2
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.
3
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.超声造影使用声诺维®(六氟化硫微泡)与对比增强计算机断层扫描和对比增强磁共振成像在局灶性肝脏病变的特征描述和肝转移检测中的比较:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(16):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17160.
4
The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.磁共振波谱和增强磁共振成像技术在辅助前列腺异常活检定位中的诊断准确性和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 May;17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. doi: 10.3310/hta17200.
5
Characterizing Breast Tumor Heterogeneity Through IVIM-DWI Parameters and Signal Decay Analysis.通过体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像(IVIM-DWI)参数和信号衰减分析表征乳腺肿瘤异质性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;15(12):1499. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121499.
6
Accuracy of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.定量扩散加权成像鉴别良恶性胰腺病变的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):7746-7759. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07880-3. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
7
Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.磁共振成像在慢性肝病成人肝细胞癌诊断中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD014798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014798.pub2.
8
Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Differentiating Metastatic From Non-metastatic Lymph Nodes in Cervical Carcinoma.扩散加权磁共振成像及表观扩散系数值在鉴别宫颈癌转移性与非转移性淋巴结中的诊断效用
Cureus. 2025 Jun 4;17(6):e85371. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85371. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
The Role of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Partially-Blinded Retrospective Study of a Prostatectomy Patient Cohort With Whole Gland Histopathology Correlation and Application of PI-RADS or TNM Staging.动态对比增强磁共振成像在评估前列腺腺癌中的作用:一项对前列腺切除患者队列进行的部分盲法回顾性研究,该研究将全腺体组织病理学相关性与PI-RADS或TNM分期的应用相结合。
Prostate. 2025 Apr;85(5):413-423. doi: 10.1002/pros.24843. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Inter-reader agreement of the BI-RADS CEM lexicon.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)乳腺增强磁共振成像(CEM)词典的阅片者间一致性
Eur Radiol. 2025 May;35(5):2378-2386. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11176-7. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of chest ultrasound in diagnosing pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis.系统评价和荟萃分析胸部超声诊断儿童肺结核的诊断准确性。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024 Oct;59(10):2381-2391. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27044. Epub 2024 May 2.
3
Meta-analysis of dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation of benign from malignant non-mass enhancement breast lesions.
动态对比增强磁共振成像和扩散加权磁共振成像用于鉴别乳腺非肿块强化病变良恶性的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 12;14:1332783. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1332783. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of Features in Probably Benign and Malignant Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI.乳腺MRI中可能为良性和恶性的非肿块强化特征评估
Int J Breast Cancer. 2024 Mar 15;2024:6661849. doi: 10.1155/2024/6661849. eCollection 2024.
5
Subcategorization of suspicious non-mass-like enhancement lesions(BI-RADS-MRI Category4).可疑非肿块样强化病变的再分类(BI-RADS-MRI 分类 4 类)。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01144-w.
6
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient metrics for MRI-only suspicious breast lesions: any added clinical value?仅基于MRI的可疑乳腺病变的定量表观扩散系数指标:有额外的临床价值吗?
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Oct 1;13(10):7092-7104. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-331. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
7
Combination of Breast Ultrasound With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Non-mass-like Breast Lesions Detected on Ultrasound: A New Integrated Strategy to Improve Diagnostic Performance.乳腺超声与磁共振成像联合用于超声检测到的非肿块型乳腺病变的诊断:一种提高诊断性能的新综合策略
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024 Jan;50(1):105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.09.009. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
8
Role of combined clinical-radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced MRI in predicting the malignancy of breast non-mass enhancements without an additional diffusion-weighted imaging sequence.基于对比增强磁共振成像的临床-影像组学联合模型在预测无额外扩散加权成像序列的乳腺非肿块强化灶恶性程度中的作用
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Sep 1;13(9):5974-5985. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1199. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
9
Comparison of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with conventional ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in malignant non-mass breast lesions.对比增强超声联合常规超声与磁共振成像对恶性非肿块型乳腺病变的诊断价值比较。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Oct;96(1150):20220880. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220880. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
10
Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Papillary Neoplasms on MRI With Non-mass Enhancement.MRI 中非肿块样强化对乳腺良恶性乳头状肿瘤的鉴别诊断
Acad Radiol. 2023 Sep;30 Suppl 2:S127-S132. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Mar 9.