Amrine-Madsen Heather, Scally Mark, Westerman Michael, Stanhope Michael J, Krajewski Carey, Springer Mark S
Graduate Group in Genetics, University of California, Riverside 9252, USA.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Aug;28(2):186-96. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00122-2.
Relationships among the seven extant orders of marsupials remain poorly understood. Most classifications recognize a fundamental split between Ameridelphia, which contains the American orders Didelphimorphia and Paucituberculata, and Australidelphia, which contains four Australasian orders (Dasyuromorphia, Diprotodontia, Notoryctemorphia, and Peramelina) and the South American order Microbiotheria, represented by Dromiciops gliroides. Ameridelphia and Australidelphia are each supported by key morphological characters with dichotomous character states. To date, molecular studies indexing all marsupial orders have reported inconclusive results. However, several studies have suggested that Dromiciops is nested within Australidelphia. This result has important implications for understanding the biogeographic history of living marsupials. To address questions in higher-level marsupial systematics, we sequenced portions of five nuclear genes (Apolipoprotein B gene; Breast and Ovarian cancer susceptibility gene 1; Recombination activating gene 1; Interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein gene; and von Willebrand factor gene) for representatives of all orders of marsupials, as well as placental outgroups. The resulting 6.4kb concatenation was analyzed using maximum parsimony, distance methods, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian methods. tests were used to examine a priori hypotheses. All analyses provided robust support for the monophyly of Australidelphia (bootstrap support=99-100%; posterior probability=1.00). Ameridelphia received much lower support, although this clade was not rejected in statistical tests. Within Diprotodontia, both Vombatiformes and Phalangeriformes were supported at the 100% bootstrap level and with posterior probabilities of 1.00.
有袋类动物现存的七个目之间的关系仍未得到很好的理解。大多数分类法都认可美洲有袋类和澳洲有袋类之间的基本划分,美洲有袋类包括美洲的负鼠目和微兽目,澳洲有袋类包括四个澳洲的目(袋鼬目、双门齿目、袋鼹目和袋狸目)以及以南美山猴(Dromiciops gliroides)为代表的南美微兽目。美洲有袋类和澳洲有袋类各自都有具有二分性状状态的关键形态学特征支持。迄今为止,对所有有袋类目的分子研究都得出了不确定的结果。然而,一些研究表明南美食蚁袋貂嵌套在澳洲有袋类之中。这一结果对于理解现存有袋类动物的生物地理历史具有重要意义。为了解决有袋类动物高级分类学中的问题,我们对有袋类所有目的代表物种以及胎盘类外类群的五个核基因(载脂蛋白B基因;乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感基因1;重组激活基因1;视网膜间视黄醇结合蛋白基因;以及血管性血友病因子基因)的部分序列进行了测序。使用最大简约法、距离法、最大似然法和贝叶斯法对得到的6.4kb串联序列进行了分析。使用检验来检验先验假设。所有分析都为澳洲有袋类的单系性提供了有力支持(自展支持率=99 - 100%;后验概率=1.00)。美洲有袋类得到了低得多的支持,尽管在统计检验中这个分支没有被拒绝。在双门齿目中,袋熊亚目和袋貂亚目在自展支持率100%以及后验概率为为支持。 1.00的水平上都得到了支持。