Davey Rachel, Edwards Sarah Matthes, Cochrane Tom
Department of Sport, Health and Exercise, School of Health, Staffordshire University, Leek Road, Stoke on Trent ST4 2DF.
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Apr;53(489):315-7.
This study compares the efficiency of two methods of recruitment into a randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of water therapy for elderly people with lower limb osteoarthritis. The direct cost of recruiting patients via general practice was 27.66 Pounds per patient (1.1 personnel hours/patient). The cost per recruited patient from a local newspaper article was 2.72 Pounds (0.2 personnel hours/patient). The cost differential between the two recruitment methods was largely owing to poor administration practices, difficulties in accessing patient information, and difficulties in contacting patients from the general practice computer database.
本研究比较了两种招募方法在一项随机对照试验中的效率,该试验旨在研究水疗法对老年下肢骨关节炎患者的成本效益。通过全科医疗招募患者的直接成本为每位患者27.66英镑(1.1个人工时/患者)。通过当地报纸文章招募每位患者的成本为2.72英镑(0.2个人工时/患者)。两种招募方法之间的成本差异主要归因于管理不善、获取患者信息困难以及从全科医疗计算机数据库联系患者困难。