Peto V, Coulter A, Bond A
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary, UK.
Fam Pract. 1993 Jun;10(2):207-11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.2.207.
Many research projects depend on general practitioners (GPs) to recruit patients into the study. As part of a study of patients' experiences of treatment for menorrhagia, completeness of recruitment and the extent of bias introduced by failure to recruit was assessed. Only 129 (41%) of 315 GPs who had agreed to recruit patients actually did so. A review of notes in six practices revealed that only 40 (20.4%) of 196 eligible patients had been recruited. There was some evidence that the recruited patients had more severe symptoms than those not recruited. There was no difference in recruitment rates between male and female doctors, but those who had received a practice visit from a member of the research team recruited more patients. A survey of participating GPs revealed that forgetfulness and time pressures were the main factors inhibiting recruitment.
许多研究项目依靠全科医生(GPs)来招募患者参与研究。作为一项关于月经过多患者治疗体验研究的一部分,对招募的完整性以及因未成功招募而引入的偏差程度进行了评估。在同意招募患者的315名全科医生中,只有129名(41%)实际进行了招募。对六个诊所的记录审查显示,在196名符合条件的患者中,只有40名(20.4%)被招募。有证据表明,被招募的患者症状比未被招募的患者更严重。男女医生的招募率没有差异,但那些接受过研究团队成员出诊的医生招募的患者更多。对参与研究的全科医生的一项调查显示,遗忘和时间压力是阻碍招募的主要因素。