Behav Res Ther. 2003 Aug;41(8):863-78. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00099-2.
This article reports on the validation of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ) and Interpretations of Intrusions Inventory (III) developed by the Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group (OCCWG) to assess the primary beliefs and appraisals considered critical to the pathogenesis of obsessions. A battery of questionnaires that assessed symptoms of anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and worry was administered to 248 outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), 105 non-obsessional anxious patients, 87 non-clinical adults from the community, and 291 undergraduate students. Tests of internal consistency and test-retest reliability indicated that the OBQ and III assessed stable aspects of OC-related thinking. Between-group differences and correlations with existing measures of OC symptoms indicated that the OBQ and III assess core cognitive features of obsessionality. However, the various subscales of the OBQ and III are highly correlated, and both measures evidenced low discriminant validity. The findings are discussed in terms of the relevance and specificity of cognitive constructs like responsibility, control and importance of thoughts, overestimated threat, tolerance of uncertainty and perfectionism for OCD.
本文报告了由强迫认知工作组(OCCWG)开发的强迫信念问卷(OBQ)和闯入性思维解释量表(III)的效度验证情况,这两个量表用于评估对强迫观念发病机制至关重要的主要信念和评价。对248名被诊断为DSM-IV强迫障碍(OCD)的门诊患者、105名非强迫性焦虑患者、87名来自社区的非临床成年人以及291名本科生进行了一系列问卷调查,这些问卷用于评估焦虑、抑郁、强迫症状和担忧症状。内部一致性检验和重测信度检验表明,OBQ和III评估了与强迫相关思维的稳定方面。组间差异以及与现有强迫症状测量指标的相关性表明,OBQ和III评估了强迫观念的核心认知特征。然而,OBQ和III的各个子量表高度相关,且这两个量表的区分效度均较低。本文根据责任、控制、思维的重要性、高估的威胁、对不确定性的容忍度和完美主义等认知结构对强迫症的相关性和特异性来讨论这些研究结果。