Elfving Britt, Dedering Asa, Németh Gunnar
Neurotec Department, Division of Physiotherapy, 23100, Karolinska Institutet, SE-141 83 Huddinge, Sweden.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2003 Aug;18(7):619-30. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00095-0.
The aim was to explore the validity and reliability of EMG for assessing lumbar muscle fatigue.
Patients with long-term low-back trouble (n=57) were compared to a healthy reference group (n=55). Back muscle fatigue and recovery were studied in relation to health-related factors.
EMG spectral variables are important tools in the assessment of patients with low-back trouble. The influence of disability on these variables needs further investigation.
EMG from the lower back muscles was recorded during a 45 s trunk extension at 80% of maximal voluntary contraction torque and during recovery. Disability was studied using questionnaires.
The reliability was high for maximal voluntary contraction torque and EMG initial median frequency, lower for the median frequency slope, and insufficient for median frequency recovery half-time. The patients had lower maximal voluntary contraction torque, higher initial median frequency at L5 level, flatter slope, and longer recovery half-time than the healthy subjects did. However, for subjects with significantly negative slope, indicating fatigue, there was no significant difference in slope between patients and healthy subjects, while, for subjects without such fatigue, patients showed significantly flatter slopes at L5. The sensitivity/specificity of the test was 86%/78%. The most significant variables selected with logistic regression were maximal voluntary contraction torque and initial median frequency at L5. Patients without significantly negative slopes during contraction and/or not exponential-like EMG recovery scored worse on several items concerning disability and self-efficacy.
EMG spectral variables in combination with torque might be used for classification. For patients with long-term low-back trouble, the ability to fatigue the lumbar muscles sufficiently to obtain a significantly negative slope during an 80% maximal voluntary contraction may be a sign of better functioning.
The ability to fatigue the back muscles during a test requiring a high force output might be achieved with back muscle training focused on increasing strength and self-efficacy.
探讨肌电图(EMG)评估腰肌疲劳的有效性和可靠性。
将长期腰痛患者(n = 57)与健康对照组(n = 55)进行比较。研究背部肌肉疲劳及恢复情况与健康相关因素的关系。
EMG频谱变量是评估腰痛患者的重要工具。残疾对这些变量的影响需要进一步研究。
在以最大自主收缩扭矩的80%进行45秒躯干伸展过程中及恢复期间,记录下背部肌肉的EMG。使用问卷研究残疾情况。
最大自主收缩扭矩和EMG初始中位频率的可靠性较高,中位频率斜率的可靠性较低,中位频率恢复半衰期的可靠性不足。与健康受试者相比,患者的最大自主收缩扭矩较低,L5水平的初始中位频率较高,斜率较平缓,恢复半衰期较长。然而,对于斜率显著为负(表明疲劳)的受试者,患者与健康受试者之间的斜率无显著差异;而对于无此类疲劳的受试者,患者在L5处的斜率明显更平缓。该测试的敏感性/特异性为86%/78%。经逻辑回归选择的最显著变量为最大自主收缩扭矩和L5处的初始中位频率。在收缩过程中斜率无显著为负且/或EMG恢复非指数样的患者,在一些与残疾和自我效能相关的项目上得分较差。
EMG频谱变量与扭矩相结合可用于分类。对于长期腰痛患者,在80%最大自主收缩期间使腰肌充分疲劳以获得显著负斜率的能力可能是功能较好的一个标志。
通过专注于增强力量和自我效能的背部肌肉训练,可能实现在需要高力量输出的测试中使背部肌肉疲劳的能力。