Kankaanpää M, Taimela S, Laaksonen D, Hänninen O, Airaksinen O
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kuopio Univeristy Hospital, Finland.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Apr;79(4):412-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90142-3.
To compare the lumbar paraspinal and gluteus maximus muscle fatigability between chronic low back pain patients and healthy controls by using electromyographic (EMG) spectral analysis during a maximal isometric endurance task.
A cross-sectional comparative study between chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects.
Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic in Finland.
Twenty women with nonspecific chronic low back pain (longer than 3 months) and 15 healthy controls.
Subjects performed maximal voluntary isometric back extensions (MVC) at 30 degrees forward flexion in a specially designed measurement unit. A 50% MVC load was used in isometric endurance test.
Low back pain intensity was assessed by using the visual analogue scale and functional disability by the Oswestry disability index. Time to endurance was measured. Bipolar surface EMG recordings were made over the lumbar paraspinal muscles (L3-L4, L5-S1) and over the gluteus maximus muscles. Average EMG (aEMG%), and initial spectral median frequency (MFinit) and change over time (MFslope) were computed.
Pain intensity and functional disability were higher and MVC and time to endurance were lower in the chronic low back pain group (p < .05). Similar muscle activity levels (aEMG%) and MFinit indicated similar muscle loading in both groups at the beginning of the endurance test. EMG spectral decreases (MFslope) indicated that lumbar paraspinal muscle fatigability was similar in both groups. In the chronic low back pain group, the gluteus maximus fatigued faster than in the control group (greater MFslope, p < .05). However, the shorter endurance time indicated greater fatigability in the chronic low back pain group in general (p < .05).
The chronic low back pain patients were weaker and fatigued faster than the healthy controls. The EMG fatigue analysis results suggest that the gluteus maximus muscles are more fatigable in chronic low back pain patients than in healthy control subjects during a sustained back extension endurance test.
通过在最大等长耐力任务中使用肌电图(EMG)频谱分析,比较慢性下腰痛患者与健康对照者的腰椎旁肌和臀大肌的疲劳性。
慢性下腰痛患者与健康对照者之间的横断面比较研究。
芬兰的物理医学与康复诊所。
20名患有非特异性慢性下腰痛(超过3个月)的女性和15名健康对照者。
受试者在专门设计的测量单元中于前屈30度时进行最大自主等长背部伸展(MVC)。等长耐力测试中使用50%MVC负荷。
使用视觉模拟量表评估下腰痛强度,使用Oswestry功能障碍指数评估功能障碍。测量耐力时间。在腰椎旁肌(L3-L4、L5-S1)和臀大肌上进行双极表面肌电图记录。计算平均肌电图(aEMG%)、初始频谱中位数频率(MFinit)和随时间的变化(MFslope)。
慢性下腰痛组的疼痛强度和功能障碍较高,而MVC和耐力时间较低(p<.05)。相似的肌肉活动水平(aEMG%)和MFinit表明两组在耐力测试开始时的肌肉负荷相似。肌电图频谱下降(MFslope)表明两组腰椎旁肌的疲劳性相似。在慢性下腰痛组中,臀大肌比对照组疲劳得更快(MFslope更大,p<.05)。然而,总体而言,慢性下腰痛组较短的耐力时间表明其疲劳性更大(p<.05)。
慢性下腰痛患者比健康对照者更虚弱且疲劳得更快。肌电图疲劳分析结果表明,在持续的背部伸展耐力测试中,慢性下腰痛患者的臀大肌比健康对照者更容易疲劳。