Schäper Michael, Demes Peter, Zupanic Michaela, Blaszkewicz Meinolf, Seeber Andreas
Institute for Occupational Physiology, University of Dortmund, Ardeystrasse 67, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2003 Aug;47(6):493-502. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meg058.
The ototoxicity of occupational exposure to toluene below 50 p.p.m. was investigated in a longitudinal study over 5 yr with four repeated examinations starting with 333 male workers from rotogravure printing plants. Past lifetime weighted average exposures (LWAE) to toluene and noise were determined from individual work histories; recent individual exposures were measured 10 times during the study (toluene, active sampling; noise, stationary measurements). The auditory thresholds were measured with pure tone audiometry. The mean LWAE exposures to toluene and noise were 45 +/- 17 p.p.m. plus 82 +/- 7 dB(A) for printers (high toluene intensity) and 10 +/- 7 p.p.m. plus 82 +/- 4 dB(A) for end-processors (low toluene intensity). The mean current exposures to toluene and noise during the study were 26 +/- 20 p.p.m. plus 81 +/- 4 dB(A) for printers and 3 +/- 3 p.p.m. plus 82 +/- 4 dB(A) for end-processors. Repeated measurement analyses (grouping factors: toluene intensity, exposure duration and noise intensity) and logistic regressions did not reveal significant effects of toluene intensity, of exposure duration and of interactions between toluene intensity and noise intensity. The stratification dependent on noise intensity itself [79 +/- 3 versus 84 +/- 1 dB(A)] was significantly associated with the auditory thresholds. Regarding the missing toluene effects, it was concluded that the threshold level for developing a hearing loss as a result of occupational toluene exposure might be above the actual limit of 50 p.p.m.
在一项为期5年的纵向研究中,对来自轮转凹版印刷厂的333名男性工人进行了4次重复检查,以调查职业接触低于50 ppm甲苯的耳毒性。根据个人工作经历确定过去一生的甲苯和噪声加权平均暴露量(LWAE);在研究期间对近期个人暴露量进行了10次测量(甲苯,主动采样;噪声,固定测量)。用纯音听力计测量听觉阈值。印刷厂工人(甲苯高强度)的甲苯和噪声平均LWAE暴露量为45±17 ppm加82±7 dB(A),后处理工人(甲苯低强度)为10±7 ppm加82±4 dB(A)。研究期间印刷厂工人和后处理工人的甲苯和噪声当前平均暴露量分别为26±20 ppm加81±4 dB(A)和3±3 ppm加82±4 dB(A)。重复测量分析(分组因素:甲苯强度、暴露持续时间和噪声强度)以及逻辑回归未显示甲苯强度、暴露持续时间以及甲苯强度与噪声强度之间相互作用的显著影响。取决于噪声强度本身的分层[79±3与84±1 dB(A)]与听觉阈值显著相关。关于甲苯效应缺失的情况,得出的结论是,职业性甲苯暴露导致听力损失的阈值水平可能高于实际限制的50 ppm。