• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的急性手术并发症和院内事件:依替巴肽与阿昔单抗对比

Acute procedural complications and in-hospital events after percutaneous coronary interventions: eptifibatide versus abciximab.

作者信息

Ajani Andrew E, Waksman Ron, Gruberg Luis, Sharma Arvind K, Lew Robert, Pinnow Ellen, Canos Daniel A, Cheneau Edouard, Castagna Marco, Satler Lowell, Pichard Augusto, Kent Kenneth M

机构信息

Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW, Suite 4B-1, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2003 Jan-Mar;4(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/s1522-1865(03)00120-3.

DOI:10.1016/s1522-1865(03)00120-3
PMID:12892767
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists reduce peri-angioplasty ischemic complications and improve in-hospital outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Prior studies have demonstrated favorable results with both eptifibatide and abciximab. The purpose of this study was to assess whether there are any differences in rates of acute procedural complications and in-hospital events with the use of these two agents.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 359 elective PCIs from June 1998 to August 2000 identified 152 PCIs treated with eptifibatide (bolus 180 microg/kg, infusion 2 microg/kg/min for 12-48 h) and 205 PCIs treated with abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg, infusion 10 microg/min for 12 h). All patients received IIb/IIIa antagonists at the initiation of the intervention.

RESULTS

The clinical demographics, the angiographic morphology, the indications, and the procedural details were similar in both groups. In the eptifibatide group, the maximum ACT was lower (235+/-45 vs. 253+/-40, P<.0001). The incidence of major procedural and in-hospital events was compared. Eptifibatide and abciximab had similar rates of major complications (death or myocardial infarction) (1.4% vs. 2.9%), repeat PTCA (3.4% vs. 1.9%), and major bleeding (3.3% vs. 4.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Eptifibatide is comparable to abciximab in regards to acute procedural complications and in-hospital events after PCI.

摘要

背景

糖蛋白IIb/IIIa拮抗剂可减少血管成形术围手术期的缺血并发症,并改善接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的院内结局。既往研究已证实依替巴肽和阿昔单抗均有良好疗效。本研究的目的是评估使用这两种药物时急性手术并发症发生率和院内事件是否存在差异。

方法

对1998年6月至2000年8月期间359例择期PCI进行回顾性分析,确定152例接受依替巴肽治疗的PCI(静脉推注180μg/kg,静脉输注2μg/kg/min,持续12 - 48小时)和205例接受阿昔单抗治疗的PCI(静脉推注0.25mg/kg,静脉输注10μg/min,持续12小时)。所有患者在介入治疗开始时均接受IIb/IIIa拮抗剂治疗。

结果

两组患者的临床人口统计学特征、血管造影形态、适应证和手术细节相似。依替巴肽组的最大活化凝血时间(ACT)较低(235±45 vs. 253±40,P<0.0001)。比较了主要手术和院内事件的发生率。依替巴肽和阿昔单抗的主要并发症(死亡或心肌梗死)发生率相似(1.4% vs. 2.9%),重复PTCA发生率相似(3.4% vs. 1.9%),严重出血发生率相似(3.3% vs. 4.3%)。

结论

在PCI术后的急性手术并发症和院内事件方面,依替巴肽与阿昔单抗相当。

相似文献

1
Acute procedural complications and in-hospital events after percutaneous coronary interventions: eptifibatide versus abciximab.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的急性手术并发症和院内事件:依替巴肽与阿昔单抗对比
Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2003 Jan-Mar;4(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/s1522-1865(03)00120-3.
2
Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, eptifibatide and abciximab: outcomes, complications and thrombocytopenia during percutaneous coronary intervention.两种血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂依替巴肽和阿昔单抗的比较:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的结果、并发症及血小板减少症
J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Jun;15(6):319-23.
3
Short-term comparative outcomes associated with the use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in patients undergoing coronary intervention.在接受冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中使用糖蛋白IIb/IIIa拮抗剂的短期比较结果。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2001 May;11(3):203-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1011904718960.
4
Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial.随机比较依替巴肽与阿昔单抗在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用:EVA-AMI 试验结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 3;56(6):463-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.093.
5
The relative safety and efficacy of abciximab and eptifibatide in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a large regional registry of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention.阿昔单抗和依替巴肽在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的相对安全性和疗效:来自当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗大型区域注册研究的见解
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 5;51(5):529-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.053.
6
Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial.比伐卢定与临时糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体阻滞剂联用与肝素及计划使用糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体阻滞剂在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较:REPLACE-2随机试验
JAMA. 2003 Feb 19;289(7):853-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.7.853.
7
Safety of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors: A heart surgeon's perspective.糖蛋白IIb-IIIa抑制剂的安全性:一位心脏外科医生的观点。
Am Heart J. 1999 Oct;138(4 Pt 2):307-16. doi: 10.1053/hj.1999.v138.a100460.
8
Long-term mortality after bolus-only administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间仅推注阿昔单抗、依替巴肽或替罗非班后的长期死亡率。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):214-21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21773.
9
Outcomes and costs of abciximab versus eptifibatide for percutaneous coronary intervention.阿昔单抗与依替巴肽用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效及成本比较
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Oct;39(10):1621-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G129. Epub 2005 Aug 16.
10
Long-term results following switch from abciximab to eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中从阿昔单抗转换为依替巴肽后的长期结果。
Clin Cardiol. 2010 Nov;33(11):686-92. doi: 10.1002/clc.20814.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors- A Promise Not Kept?糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂的作用——承诺落空了?
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2008 May;4(2):84-91. doi: 10.2174/157340308784245793.