Pilling J R
Radiology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.
Br J Radiol. 2003 Aug;76(908):519-24. doi: 10.1259/bjr/67551353.
A study was undertaken to assess the acceptability to users of a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). A questionnaire was issued to 208 users. Some questions required a graduated score in response and others a free text response. 101 responses were received from a cross section of hospital staff. The majority of users judged PACS to be a major advance for the hospital, with high quality images, less frustration than using film and an improvement in their working lives. They judged that it had made a positive change in their working practices and had met their expectations. They welcomed the access it gave them to Radiology reports. There was more ambivalence about the impact it had made to the efficiency of clinic consultations and the conduct of ward rounds. Free text responses were made concerning the benefits and disadvantages of PACS. Analysis of these demonstrated many more benefits than disadvantages. The Radiology department has been enabled to address the concerns of staff raised through the questionnaire, and has been encouraged by the positive responses. PACS has been accepted well by a wide cross section of hospital staff. It has improved their working lives and made a major contribution to the working of the hospital as a whole.
开展了一项研究以评估图像存档与通信系统(PACS)用户的接受程度。向208名用户发放了问卷。部分问题要求给出分级评分回答,其他问题则要求给出自由文本回答。从医院工作人员的不同层面收到了101份回复。大多数用户认为PACS是医院的一项重大进步,图像质量高,比使用胶片时的挫败感少,并且改善了他们的工作生活。他们认为PACS给他们的工作方式带来了积极变化,并且达到了他们的期望。他们对PACS能让他们获取放射学报告表示欢迎。对于PACS对门诊会诊效率和查房开展的影响,看法则更为矛盾。针对PACS的利弊给出了自由文本回答。对这些回答的分析表明,利远大于弊。放射科得以解决通过问卷提出的工作人员的担忧,并且积极的回复也使其受到鼓舞。PACS得到了医院各层面工作人员的广泛认可。它改善了他们的工作生活,并且对整个医院的运作做出了重大贡献。