Araujo Sergio Eduardo Alonso, da Silva eSousa Afonso Henrique, de Campos Fábio Guilherme Caserta Marysael, Habr-Gama Angelita, Dumarco Rodrigo Blanco, Caravatto Pedro Paulo de Paris, Nahas Sergio Carlos, da Silva JoséHyppólito, Kiss Desidério Roberto, Gama-Rodrigues Joaquim José
Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003 May-Jun;58(3):133-40. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812003000300002. Epub 2003 Jul 22.
The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection compared to conventional approach for surgical treatment of patients with distal rectal cancer presenting with incomplete response after chemoradiation.
Twenty eight patients with distal rectal adenocarcinoma were randomized to undergo surgical treatment by laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection or conventional approach and evaluated prospectively. Thirteen underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and 15 conventional approach.
There was no significant difference (p<0,05) between the two studied groups regarding: gender, age, body mass index, patients with previous abdominal surgeries, intra and post operative complications, need for blood transfusion, hospital stay after surgery, length of resected segment and pathological staging. Mean operation time was 228 minutes for the laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection versus 284 minutes for the conventional approach (p=0.04). Mean anesthesia duration was shorter (p=0.03) for laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection when compared to conventional approach : 304 and 362 minutes, respectively. There was no need for conversion to open approach in this series. After a mean follow-up of 47.2 months and with the exclusion of two patients in the conventional abdominoperineal resection who presented with unsuspected synchronic metastasis during surgery, local recurrence was observed in two patients in the conventional group and in none in the laparoscopic group.
We conclude that laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection is feasible, similar to conventional approach concerning surgery duration, intra operative morbidity, blood requirements and post operative morbidity. Larger number of cases and an extended follow-up are required to adequate evaluation of oncological results for patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection after chemoradiation for radical treatment of distal rectal cancer.
本研究旨在评估与传统手术方式相比,腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术治疗接受放化疗后反应不完全的低位直肠癌患者的安全性和有效性。
28例低位直肠腺癌患者被随机分为两组,分别接受腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术或传统手术方式,并进行前瞻性评估。13例患者接受腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术,15例接受传统手术方式。
在以下方面,两组研究对象之间无显著差异(p<0.05):性别、年龄、体重指数、既往有腹部手术史的患者、术中及术后并发症、输血需求、术后住院时间、切除肠段长度和病理分期。腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术的平均手术时间为228分钟,而传统手术方式为284分钟(p=0.04)。与传统手术方式相比,腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术的平均麻醉时间更短(p=0.03),分别为304分钟和362分钟。本系列研究中无需转为开放手术。平均随访47.2个月,排除传统腹会阴联合切除术中2例在手术中出现意外同步转移的患者后,传统组有2例出现局部复发,而腹腔镜组无局部复发。
我们得出结论,腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术是可行的,在手术持续时间、术中发病率、血液需求和术后发病率方面与传统手术方式相似。对于接受放化疗后行腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术根治低位直肠癌的患者,需要更多病例和更长时间的随访来充分评估肿瘤学结果。