Jones Edgar, Wessely Simon
Department of Psychological Medicine, Guy's, Kings and St Thomas's School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
J Trauma Stress. 2003 Aug;16(4):411-9. doi: 10.1023/A:1024426321072.
"Forward psychiatry" was devised in World War I for the treatment of shell shock and today is the standard intervention for combat stress reaction. It relied on three principles: proximity to battle, immediacy, and expectation of recovery, subsequently given the acronym "PIE." Both US and UK forces belatedly reintroduced PIE methods during World War II to return servicemen to active duty and made confident claims for its efficacy. Advanced treatment units also appeared to have minimized psychiatric battle casualties during Korean and Vietnamese Wars. Evaluations of its use by Israeli forces in the Lebanon conflict showed higher return-to-duty rates than at base hospitals. A reexamination of these examples suggests that reported outcomes tended to exaggerate its effectiveness both as a treatment for acute stress reaction and as a prophylaxis for chronic disorders such as PTSD. It remains uncertain who is being served by the intervention: whether it is the individual soldier or the needs of the military.
“前线精神病疗法”是在第一次世界大战期间为治疗炮弹休克症而设计的,如今是应对战斗应激反应的标准干预措施。它基于三项原则:靠近战场、即时性和康复预期,随后被简称为“PIE”。美国和英国军队在第二次世界大战期间都姗姗来迟地重新引入了PIE方法,以使军人重返现役,并对其疗效充满信心。在朝鲜战争和越南战争期间,先进的治疗单位似乎也将精神病战斗伤亡减到了最低。对以色列军队在黎巴嫩冲突中使用该疗法的评估显示,其重返岗位率高于基地医院。对这些案例的重新审视表明,所报告的结果往往夸大了其作为急性应激反应治疗方法以及作为创伤后应激障碍等慢性疾病预防措施的有效性。尚不确定这种干预措施服务的对象是谁:是个体士兵还是军队的需求。